Is Marcos a boy or girl name?
Marcos is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 639 boys were named Marcos, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.3% of the 53,151 US babies named Marcos were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #482
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Marcos since 1888
- 53,151
- Most popular year
- 2001
- 1,415 babies
Boys and girls named Marcos, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 5 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1900s | 33 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 209 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 467 | 6 | 1.3% |
| 1930s | 399 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 555 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 1,062 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 2,200 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 4,610 | 15 | 0.3% |
| 1980s | 6,921 | 65 | 0.9% |
| 1990s | 11,790 | 65 | 0.5% |
| 2000s | 13,592 | 11 | 0.1% |
| 2010s | 8,028 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 3,118 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 639 | #482 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 638 | #476 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 619 | #491 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 601 | #490 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 621 | #480 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 658 | #454 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 705 | #432 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 732 | #425 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 721 | #431 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 762 | #408 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 769 | #405 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 870 | #363 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 893 | #344 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 891 | #340 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 1,027 | #312 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 1,212 | #280 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 1,349 | #261 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 1,388 | #254 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 1,386 | #248 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 1,360 | #246 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 1,369 | #244 | 6 | #15,359 |
| 2003 | 1,379 | #241 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 1,327 | #247 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 1,415 | #240 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 1,407 | #239 | 5 | #16,631 |
| 1999 | 1,316 | #243 | 5 | #15,933 |
| 1998 | 1,341 | #236 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 1,320 | #234 | 5 | #15,207 |
| 1996 | 1,350 | #224 | 8 | #10,159 |
| 1995 | 1,144 | #249 | 8 | #10,157 |
| 1994 | 1,139 | #253 | 13 | #6,934 |
| 1993 | 1,113 | #257 | 6 | #12,814 |
| 1992 | 1,077 | #263 | 6 | #12,728 |
| 1991 | 1,028 | #264 | 6 | #12,483 |
| 1990 | 962 | #273 | 8 | #9,810 |
| 1989 | 805 | #300 | 7 | #10,398 |
| 1988 | 727 | #310 | 8 | #8,890 |
| 1987 | 705 | #306 | 10 | #7,132 |
| 1986 | 738 | #284 | 5 | #12,051 |
| 1985 | 725 | #284 | 7 | #8,890 |
| 1984 | 665 | #300 | 7 | #8,741 |
| 1983 | 672 | #295 | 6 | #9,742 |
| 1982 | 623 | #316 | 8 | #7,913 |
| 1981 | 631 | #304 | 7 | #8,669 |
| 1980 | 630 | #309 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 531 | #340 | 10 | #6,491 |
| 1978 | 528 | #334 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 527 | #339 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 451 | #359 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 521 | #335 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 463 | #357 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 454 | #362 | 5 | #9,216 |
| 1972 | 406 | #390 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 362 | #427 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 367 | #427 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 308 | #446 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 265 | #467 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 248 | #479 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 199 | #545 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 245 | #490 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 220 | #527 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 187 | #581 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 186 | #575 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 177 | #594 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 165 | #611 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 153 | #624 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 126 | #680 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 109 | #717 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 103 | #723 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 107 | #711 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 99 | #726 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 94 | #740 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 95 | #724 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 82 | #779 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 94 | #709 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 84 | #751 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 75 | #793 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 53 | #981 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 70 | #798 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 52 | #873 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 41 | #1,030 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 45 | #1,004 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 47 | #983 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 40 | #1,032 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 48 | #926 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 39 | #1,024 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 42 | #987 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 27 | #1,300 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 40 | #1,002 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 35 | #1,116 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 38 | #1,069 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 40 | #1,023 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 41 | #1,046 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 54 | #872 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 43 | #1,064 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 48 | #980 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 53 | #935 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 54 | #945 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 34 | #1,257 | 6 | #4,643 |
| 1925 | 46 | #1,017 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 44 | #1,086 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 54 | #935 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 30 | #1,360 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 56 | #944 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 48 | #1,000 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 36 | #1,182 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 30 | #1,308 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 39 | #1,075 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 21 | #1,578 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 24 | #1,396 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 27 | #1,119 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 13 | #1,556 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 12 | #1,493 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 7 | #1,483 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 7 | #1,178 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 6 | #1,288 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 7 | #1,076 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 7 | #1,054 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 6 | #1,158 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 5 | #1,124 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Marcos reached #224 in 1996. As a girl name, it reached #4,643 in 1926. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2000s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Marcos
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.