Is Pablo a boy or girl name?
Pablo is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 794 boys were named Pablo, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.1% of the 49,686 US babies named Pablo were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #406
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Pablo since 1880
- 49,686
- Most popular year
- 2006
- 1,174 babies
Boys and girls named Pablo, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 95 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 121 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 214 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 586 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 1,632 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 1,416 | 12 | 0.8% |
| 1940s | 1,417 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 1,967 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 2,689 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 4,020 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 5,123 | 22 | 0.4% |
| 1990s | 8,000 | 30 | 0.4% |
| 2000s | 10,482 | 5 | 0% |
| 2010s | 7,861 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 3,994 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 794 | #406 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 852 | #378 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 777 | #414 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 774 | #402 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 797 | #385 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 791 | #396 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 749 | #418 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 700 | #444 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 794 | #402 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 803 | #394 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 786 | #398 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 742 | #403 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 826 | #366 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 840 | #357 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 830 | #361 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 912 | #344 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 1,006 | #327 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 1,095 | #305 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 1,174 | #292 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 1,169 | #284 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 1,047 | #303 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 1,021 | #299 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 1,011 | #295 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 1,037 | #289 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 1,010 | #297 | 5 | #16,906 |
| 1999 | 938 | #306 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 902 | #310 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 890 | #304 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 794 | #331 | 6 | #13,020 |
| 1995 | 804 | #325 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 767 | #327 | 10 | #8,610 |
| 1993 | 751 | #337 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 766 | #332 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 709 | #342 | 7 | #11,140 |
| 1990 | 679 | #353 | 7 | #11,041 |
| 1989 | 628 | #361 | 8 | #9,399 |
| 1988 | 499 | #399 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 516 | #374 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 522 | #361 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 462 | #387 | 9 | #7,384 |
| 1984 | 487 | #366 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 477 | #368 | 5 | #11,487 |
| 1982 | 500 | #358 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 537 | #340 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 495 | #359 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 444 | #382 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 433 | #370 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 424 | #381 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 447 | #362 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 412 | #383 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 409 | #384 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 365 | #407 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 354 | #421 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 355 | #431 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 377 | #421 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 328 | #438 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 306 | #436 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 271 | #463 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 277 | #457 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 235 | #499 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 261 | #490 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 247 | #509 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 277 | #479 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 255 | #497 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 232 | #522 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 232 | #517 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 213 | #527 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 215 | #528 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 194 | #542 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 178 | #552 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 188 | #531 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 193 | #503 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 174 | #535 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 186 | #497 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 194 | #481 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 169 | #514 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 174 | #499 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 150 | #552 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 168 | #498 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 127 | #531 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 145 | #503 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 136 | #541 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 120 | #565 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 119 | #547 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 109 | #570 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 96 | #592 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 107 | #566 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 134 | #496 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 115 | #536 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 136 | #489 | 7 | #3,668 |
| 1934 | 142 | #479 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 146 | #458 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 176 | #423 | 5 | #4,937 |
| 1931 | 155 | #453 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 209 | #401 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 182 | #439 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 174 | #459 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 163 | #477 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 200 | #430 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 166 | #466 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 159 | #492 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 185 | #452 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 139 | #533 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 131 | #545 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 133 | #532 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 93 | #631 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 98 | #624 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 85 | #648 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 68 | #742 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 62 | #766 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 53 | #720 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 35 | #815 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 32 | #778 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 31 | #543 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 29 | #531 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 34 | #434 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 23 | #535 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 16 | #656 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 28 | #419 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 12 | #731 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 22 | #463 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 17 | #546 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 21 | #470 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 19 | #448 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 22 | #507 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 13 | #575 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 7 | #968 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 20 | #432 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 11 | #713 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 16 | #521 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 10 | #714 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 6 | #1,001 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 10 | #739 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 10 | #626 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 18 | #429 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 11 | #615 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 11 | #638 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 12 | #536 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 7 | #825 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 16 | #475 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 9 | #694 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 10 | #631 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 8 | #741 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 11 | #594 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Pablo reached #284 in 2005. As a girl name, it reached #3,668 in 1935. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2000s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.