Is Gaetano a boy or girl name?
Gaetano is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 21 boys were named Gaetano, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 3,834 US babies named Gaetano were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #4,739
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Gaetano since 1904
- 3,834
- Most popular year
- 1921
- 87 babies
Boys and girls named Gaetano, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 35 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 546 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 658 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 316 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 221 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 236 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 359 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 351 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 275 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 267 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 257 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 210 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 103 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21 | #4,739 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 16 | #5,742 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 15 | #5,951 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 26 | #4,050 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 25 | #4,054 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 12 | #6,916 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 16 | #5,614 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 28 | #3,814 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 26 | #4,028 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 16 | #5,584 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 23 | #4,303 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 22 | #4,374 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 34 | #3,255 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 18 | #5,051 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 15 | #5,831 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 21 | #4,637 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 23 | #4,304 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 21 | #4,542 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 25 | #3,927 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 29 | #3,406 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 27 | #3,487 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 27 | #3,392 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 28 | #3,212 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 28 | #3,172 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 28 | #3,105 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 25 | #3,211 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 34 | #2,515 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 28 | #2,782 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 28 | #2,700 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 25 | #2,870 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 24 | #2,978 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 36 | #2,177 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 20 | #3,258 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 26 | #2,629 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 21 | #2,999 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 33 | #2,123 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 19 | #2,888 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 28 | #2,140 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 29 | #2,023 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 23 | #2,318 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 30 | #1,857 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 23 | #2,233 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 30 | #1,870 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 29 | #1,915 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 31 | #1,827 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 33 | #1,730 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 30 | #1,767 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 24 | #2,027 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 15 | #2,747 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 32 | #1,602 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 47 | #1,222 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 36 | #1,412 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 37 | #1,396 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 49 | #1,171 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 48 | #1,197 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 46 | #1,157 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 35 | #1,294 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 30 | #1,393 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 41 | #1,171 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 43 | #1,149 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 39 | #1,247 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 39 | #1,240 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 31 | #1,408 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 30 | #1,474 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 25 | #1,634 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 23 | #1,680 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 31 | #1,407 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 24 | #1,646 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 27 | #1,518 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 17 | #1,923 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 25 | #1,535 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 24 | #1,560 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 34 | #1,276 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 17 | #1,861 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 14 | #2,061 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 27 | #1,416 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 16 | #1,902 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 23 | #1,570 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 19 | #1,660 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 19 | #1,549 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 20 | #1,547 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 20 | #1,600 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 30 | #1,283 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 25 | #1,345 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 22 | #1,447 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 32 | #1,152 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 31 | #1,179 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 23 | #1,424 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 35 | #1,106 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 29 | #1,257 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 29 | #1,253 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 28 | #1,260 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 30 | #1,241 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 37 | #1,115 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 42 | #1,073 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 56 | #892 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 65 | #816 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 64 | #842 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 56 | #898 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 47 | #1,002 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 60 | #902 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 76 | #752 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 70 | #803 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 87 | #696 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 77 | #751 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 51 | #941 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 79 | #714 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 77 | #688 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 76 | #682 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 72 | #686 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 64 | #636 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 46 | #661 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 43 | #641 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 18 | #772 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 20 | #662 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 7 | #1,196 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 9 | #978 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 8 | #1,035 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 5 | #1,306 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 6 | #1,119 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Gaetano reached #636 in 1914. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.