Is Clovis a boy or girl name?
Clovis is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 11 boys were named Clovis, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 17% of the 3,697 US babies named Clovis were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #7,311
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Clovis since 1880
- 3,697
- Most popular year
- 1923
- 101 babies
Boys and girls named Clovis, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 14 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 50 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 76 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 511 | 127 | 19.9% |
| 1920s | 653 | 200 | 23.4% |
| 1930s | 492 | 146 | 22.9% |
| 1940s | 359 | 83 | 18.8% |
| 1950s | 270 | 63 | 18.9% |
| 1960s | 163 | 8 | 4.7% |
| 1970s | 127 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 98 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 51 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 58 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 89 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 59 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 11 | #7,311 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 5 | #12,568 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 16 | #5,672 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 19 | #4,962 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 8 | #8,885 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 13 | #6,484 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 14 | #6,089 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 11 | #7,184 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 8 | #9,012 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 6 | #10,935 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 9 | #8,240 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 10 | #7,654 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 12 | #6,663 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 6 | #11,000 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 5 | #12,834 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 6 | #11,319 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 6 | #11,175 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 8 | #8,870 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 8 | #8,432 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 9 | #7,645 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 10 | #6,619 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 6 | #9,293 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 8 | #6,719 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 6 | #8,126 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 10 | #5,525 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 5 | #8,952 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 8 | #6,227 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 8 | #6,044 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 6 | #7,340 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 6 | #7,121 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 6 | #6,564 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 10 | #4,303 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 12 | #3,684 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 9 | #4,386 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 13 | #3,297 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 12 | #3,442 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 10 | #4,006 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 7 | #5,039 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 13 | #3,289 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 12 | #3,393 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 15 | #2,815 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 9 | #3,900 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 11 | #3,306 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 10 | #3,483 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 16 | #2,479 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 12 | #2,886 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 15 | #2,448 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 13 | #2,704 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 14 | #2,530 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 16 | #2,149 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 10 | #2,764 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 11 | #2,496 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 14 | #2,151 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 11 | #2,499 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 21 | #1,743 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 20 | #1,800 | 8 | #4,953 |
| 1962 | 24 | #1,630 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 22 | #1,740 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 14 | #2,228 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 23 | #1,674 | 6 | #5,670 |
| 1958 | 21 | #1,735 | 5 | #6,258 |
| 1957 | 38 | #1,269 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 23 | #1,648 | 11 | #3,733 |
| 1955 | 23 | #1,617 | 8 | #4,440 |
| 1954 | 28 | #1,441 | 10 | #3,760 |
| 1953 | 24 | #1,555 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 25 | #1,522 | 8 | #4,189 |
| 1951 | 38 | #1,173 | 6 | #4,942 |
| 1950 | 27 | #1,402 | 9 | #3,717 |
| 1949 | 26 | #1,441 | 6 | #4,773 |
| 1948 | 39 | #1,147 | 7 | #4,270 |
| 1947 | 36 | #1,217 | 6 | #4,846 |
| 1946 | 43 | #1,045 | 5 | #5,086 |
| 1945 | 32 | #1,165 | 8 | #3,435 |
| 1944 | 30 | #1,217 | 11 | #2,798 |
| 1943 | 26 | #1,373 | 7 | #3,873 |
| 1942 | 43 | #1,027 | 9 | #3,225 |
| 1941 | 42 | #989 | 11 | #2,704 |
| 1940 | 42 | #996 | 13 | #2,321 |
| 1939 | 32 | #1,146 | 8 | #3,194 |
| 1938 | 34 | #1,112 | 13 | #2,360 |
| 1937 | 53 | #835 | 16 | #2,014 |
| 1936 | 37 | #1,054 | 8 | #3,155 |
| 1935 | 63 | #780 | 15 | #2,121 |
| 1934 | 62 | #788 | 16 | #2,014 |
| 1933 | 58 | #812 | 20 | #1,730 |
| 1932 | 40 | #1,060 | 14 | #2,260 |
| 1931 | 47 | #963 | 21 | #1,699 |
| 1930 | 66 | #797 | 15 | #2,216 |
| 1929 | 65 | #801 | 12 | #2,609 |
| 1928 | 58 | #875 | 9 | #3,219 |
| 1927 | 55 | #931 | 19 | #2,037 |
| 1926 | 63 | #833 | 19 | #2,015 |
| 1925 | 62 | #844 | 26 | #1,653 |
| 1924 | 72 | #793 | 25 | #1,729 |
| 1923 | 70 | #795 | 31 | #1,469 |
| 1922 | 68 | #819 | 26 | #1,652 |
| 1921 | 62 | #885 | 15 | #2,399 |
| 1920 | 78 | #739 | 18 | #2,089 |
| 1919 | 65 | #811 | 17 | #2,088 |
| 1918 | 68 | #790 | 22 | #1,766 |
| 1917 | 84 | #651 | 10 | #2,926 |
| 1916 | 63 | #774 | 17 | #1,959 |
| 1915 | 65 | #742 | 23 | #1,531 |
| 1914 | 64 | #634 | 7 | #2,951 |
| 1913 | 40 | #735 | 12 | #1,796 |
| 1912 | 36 | #717 | 10 | #1,870 |
| 1911 | 13 | #936 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 13 | #879 | 9 | #1,656 |
| 1909 | 7 | #1,175 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 12 | #789 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 5 | #1,381 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 8 | #943 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 9 | #851 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 12 | #695 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 12 | #663 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 5 | #1,083 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 6 | #1,193 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 8 | #821 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 7 | #862 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 7 | #913 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 5 | #1,111 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 9 | #714 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 6 | #981 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 8 | #761 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 7 | #832 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 7 | #761 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Clovis reached #634 in 1914. As a girl name, it reached #1,469 in 1923. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Clovis
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.