Is Porfirio a boy or girl name?
Porfirio was a boy name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 3,519 US babies named Porfirio were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #8,776
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Porfirio since 1903
- 3,519
- Most popular year
- 1921
- 56 babies
Boys and girls named Porfirio, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 12 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 152 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 409 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 324 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 360 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 340 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 343 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 396 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 369 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 361 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 252 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 149 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 52 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 9 | #8,776 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 9 | #8,753 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 16 | #5,803 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 9 | #8,663 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 9 | #8,557 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 12 | #7,071 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 17 | #5,482 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 15 | #6,000 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 17 | #5,490 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 13 | #6,593 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 11 | #7,420 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 14 | #6,164 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 19 | #4,999 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 16 | #5,609 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 15 | #5,963 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 17 | #5,486 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 22 | #4,502 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 22 | #4,464 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 22 | #4,332 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 28 | #3,507 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 23 | #3,971 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 25 | #3,601 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 27 | #3,322 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 26 | #3,388 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 40 | #2,415 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 24 | #3,347 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 41 | #2,229 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 37 | #2,297 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 34 | #2,369 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 38 | #2,165 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 45 | #1,887 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 33 | #2,332 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 35 | #2,205 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 31 | #2,337 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 43 | #1,833 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 30 | #2,280 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 47 | #1,571 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 24 | #2,382 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 36 | #1,750 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 38 | #1,661 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 42 | #1,498 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 38 | #1,582 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 37 | #1,642 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 37 | #1,625 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 40 | #1,538 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 47 | #1,366 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 36 | #1,591 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 46 | #1,353 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 48 | #1,282 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 36 | #1,496 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 29 | #1,683 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 37 | #1,392 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 43 | #1,281 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 44 | #1,269 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 30 | #1,570 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 28 | #1,556 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 30 | #1,449 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 36 | #1,270 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 44 | #1,125 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 24 | #1,617 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 31 | #1,425 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 37 | #1,296 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 39 | #1,257 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 37 | #1,317 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 37 | #1,317 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 43 | #1,193 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 34 | #1,336 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 29 | #1,478 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 45 | #1,137 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 39 | #1,210 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 23 | #1,618 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 26 | #1,499 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 33 | #1,314 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 36 | #1,237 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 32 | #1,285 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 31 | #1,318 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 47 | #1,031 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 48 | #1,048 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 35 | #1,192 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 41 | #1,004 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 32 | #1,185 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 21 | #1,567 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 36 | #1,159 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 40 | #1,035 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 29 | #1,272 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 26 | #1,316 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 27 | #1,304 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 32 | #1,177 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 21 | #1,496 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 28 | #1,290 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 34 | #1,146 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 22 | #1,491 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 50 | #921 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 37 | #1,125 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 47 | #1,001 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 43 | #1,052 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 47 | #1,017 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 38 | #1,173 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 43 | #1,086 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 43 | #1,066 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 33 | #1,283 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 28 | #1,412 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 32 | #1,303 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 56 | #948 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 46 | #1,030 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 29 | #1,343 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 23 | #1,583 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 27 | #1,356 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 17 | #1,829 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 9 | #2,773 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 15 | #1,668 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 17 | #1,303 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 7 | #2,221 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 8 | #1,286 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 5 | #1,382 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 7 | #993 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Porfirio reached #921 in 1932. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.