Is Ezell a boy or girl name?
Ezell was mostly a boy name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 11.2% of the 3,654 US babies named Ezell were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #11,311
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Ezell since 1897
- 3,654
- Most popular year
- 1922
- 71 babies
Boys and girls named Ezell, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 12 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 64 | 6 | 8.6% |
| 1910s | 293 | 117 | 28.5% |
| 1920s | 460 | 157 | 25.4% |
| 1930s | 473 | 57 | 10.8% |
| 1940s | 489 | 52 | 9.6% |
| 1950s | 476 | 22 | 4.4% |
| 1960s | 295 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 239 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 139 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 147 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 81 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 46 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 29 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6 | #11,311 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 7 | #10,059 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 9 | #8,512 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 7 | #9,878 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 5 | #12,745 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 5 | #12,754 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 5 | #12,817 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 6 | #11,157 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 6 | #11,171 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 7 | #10,052 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 7 | #9,963 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 5 | #12,865 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 6 | #11,446 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 11 | #7,250 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 9 | #8,216 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 6 | #10,512 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 9 | #7,733 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 7 | #8,962 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 13 | #5,505 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 10 | #6,610 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 10 | #6,468 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 10 | #6,187 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 13 | #4,966 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 11 | #5,392 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 18 | #3,727 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 22 | #3,146 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 22 | #3,081 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 19 | #3,381 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 16 | #3,707 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 16 | #3,663 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 17 | #3,361 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 13 | #3,760 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 14 | #3,397 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 15 | #3,180 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 10 | #4,146 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 14 | #3,153 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 10 | #3,955 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 13 | #3,354 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 15 | #2,942 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 18 | #2,651 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 20 | #2,407 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 15 | #2,831 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 29 | #1,800 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 24 | #2,016 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 25 | #1,904 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 16 | #2,495 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 24 | #1,839 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 32 | #1,518 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 30 | #1,611 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 24 | #1,814 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 27 | #1,577 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 21 | #1,746 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 31 | #1,375 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 36 | #1,267 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 25 | #1,569 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 24 | #1,627 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 33 | #1,362 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 25 | #1,596 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 39 | #1,270 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 34 | #1,370 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 34 | #1,344 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 46 | #1,140 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 34 | #1,353 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 31 | #1,399 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 52 | #1,048 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 49 | #1,070 | 5 | #6,004 |
| 1953 | 58 | #940 | 8 | #4,346 |
| 1952 | 60 | #918 | 9 | #3,911 |
| 1951 | 62 | #894 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 50 | #982 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 54 | #943 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 61 | #874 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 53 | #977 | 9 | #3,810 |
| 1946 | 45 | #1,025 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 39 | #1,022 | 6 | #4,193 |
| 1944 | 48 | #922 | 8 | #3,481 |
| 1943 | 54 | #908 | 8 | #3,596 |
| 1942 | 52 | #925 | 10 | #3,055 |
| 1941 | 40 | #1,023 | 6 | #4,112 |
| 1940 | 43 | #984 | 5 | #4,565 |
| 1939 | 37 | #1,058 | 6 | #3,917 |
| 1938 | 50 | #890 | 9 | #3,001 |
| 1937 | 47 | #914 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 52 | #846 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 32 | #1,175 | 7 | #3,523 |
| 1934 | 42 | #991 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 56 | #830 | 7 | #3,535 |
| 1932 | 51 | #904 | 10 | #2,893 |
| 1931 | 49 | #926 | 11 | #2,633 |
| 1930 | 57 | #877 | 7 | #3,788 |
| 1929 | 49 | #966 | 18 | #1,969 |
| 1928 | 50 | #966 | 16 | #2,222 |
| 1927 | 42 | #1,102 | 22 | #1,837 |
| 1926 | 43 | #1,073 | 13 | #2,614 |
| 1925 | 50 | #961 | 19 | #2,059 |
| 1924 | 40 | #1,142 | 14 | #2,575 |
| 1923 | 49 | #1,001 | 9 | #3,464 |
| 1922 | 52 | #982 | 19 | #2,046 |
| 1921 | 40 | #1,128 | 10 | #3,241 |
| 1920 | 45 | #1,039 | 17 | #2,204 |
| 1919 | 49 | #963 | 17 | #2,104 |
| 1918 | 38 | #1,115 | 20 | #1,907 |
| 1917 | 34 | #1,154 | 16 | #2,136 |
| 1916 | 35 | #1,102 | 20 | #1,756 |
| 1915 | 34 | #1,108 | 10 | #2,771 |
| 1914 | 35 | #939 | 9 | #2,494 |
| 1913 | 30 | #903 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 12 | #1,451 | 12 | #1,648 |
| 1911 | 16 | #841 | 8 | #1,843 |
| 1910 | 10 | #1,068 | 5 | #2,536 |
| 1909 | 12 | #861 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 5 | #1,459 | 6 | #1,940 |
| 1907 | 12 | #788 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 9 | #862 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 6 | #1,111 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 7 | #946 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 6 | #1,052 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 7 | #1,085 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 6 | #971 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 6 | #987 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Ezell reached #788 in 1907. As a girl name, it reached #1,648 in 1912. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Ezell
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.