Is Heber a boy or girl name?
Heber is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 33 boys were named Heber, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 3,131 US babies named Heber were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #3,472
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Heber since 1881
- 3,131
- Most popular year
- 2005
- 81 babies
Boys and girls named Heber, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 74 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 101 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 66 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 289 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 356 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 188 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 125 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 119 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 90 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 108 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 182 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 289 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 585 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 405 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 154 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33 | #3,472 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 29 | #3,827 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 41 | #3,026 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 28 | #3,848 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 23 | #4,320 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 28 | #3,837 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 30 | #3,646 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 33 | #3,408 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 24 | #4,237 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 38 | #3,045 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 37 | #3,058 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 44 | #2,681 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 60 | #2,190 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 47 | #2,600 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 64 | #2,103 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 58 | #2,266 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 66 | #2,097 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 61 | #2,197 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 69 | #1,953 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 81 | #1,664 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 49 | #2,325 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 41 | #2,523 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 58 | #1,929 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 52 | #2,035 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 50 | #2,030 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 38 | #2,371 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 28 | #2,885 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 32 | #2,515 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 42 | #2,057 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 26 | #2,794 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 26 | #2,801 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 23 | #2,974 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 31 | #2,378 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 24 | #2,774 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 19 | #3,224 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 21 | #2,939 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 23 | #2,549 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 12 | #3,822 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 14 | #3,330 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 19 | #2,638 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 19 | #2,566 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 17 | #2,715 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 23 | #2,227 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 15 | #2,955 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 19 | #2,573 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 14 | #3,067 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 12 | #3,283 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 13 | #3,093 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 7 | #4,607 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 13 | #2,972 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 14 | #2,721 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 9 | #3,546 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 5 | #5,274 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 14 | #2,612 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 7 | #4,005 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 9 | #3,165 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 6 | #3,880 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 8 | #3,089 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 11 | #2,533 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 6 | #3,688 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 10 | #2,733 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 10 | #2,748 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 9 | #2,930 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 12 | #2,467 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 9 | #2,955 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 7 | #3,411 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 7 | #3,392 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 11 | #2,545 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 11 | #2,553 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 10 | #2,657 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 18 | #1,852 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 10 | #2,607 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 14 | #2,109 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 16 | #1,937 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 15 | #1,970 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 16 | #1,898 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 8 | #2,875 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 11 | #2,428 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 17 | #1,654 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 10 | #2,375 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 18 | #1,731 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 11 | #2,318 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 14 | #1,944 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 20 | #1,539 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 15 | #1,831 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 17 | #1,716 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 19 | #1,599 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 17 | #1,679 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 17 | #1,730 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 20 | #1,583 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 18 | #1,673 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 13 | #2,140 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 25 | #1,408 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 27 | #1,409 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 23 | #1,545 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 35 | #1,219 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 27 | #1,449 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 35 | #1,232 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 31 | #1,316 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 48 | #1,024 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 30 | #1,340 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 44 | #1,064 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 44 | #1,061 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 39 | #1,146 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 38 | #1,133 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 40 | #1,086 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 41 | #1,024 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 35 | #1,107 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 45 | #932 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 27 | #1,113 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 25 | #1,008 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 19 | #1,074 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 8 | #1,329 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 11 | #1,008 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 11 | #918 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 9 | #985 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 9 | #870 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 8 | #924 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 10 | #752 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 11 | #658 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 8 | #997 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 9 | #747 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 8 | #841 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 6 | #999 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 12 | #654 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 13 | #588 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 11 | #650 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 9 | #728 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 13 | #584 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 13 | #508 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 7 | #843 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 8 | #745 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 9 | #719 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 7 | #785 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 9 | #665 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 12 | #561 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 11 | #585 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 6 | #836 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 6 | #883 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 6 | #819 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Heber reached #508 in 1891. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2000s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.