Is Hezekiah a boy or girl name?
Hezekiah is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 626 boys were named Hezekiah, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.1% of the 10,593 US babies named Hezekiah were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #490
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Hezekiah since 1880
- 10,593
- Most popular year
- 2024
- 626 babies
Boys and girls named Hezekiah, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 108 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 126 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 112 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 328 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 395 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 278 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 286 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 254 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 143 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 153 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 152 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 501 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 1,785 | 5 | 0.3% |
| 2010s | 3,318 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 2,644 | 5 | 0.2% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 626 | #490 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 555 | #533 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 489 | #585 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 495 | #570 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 479 | #578 | 5 | #16,007 |
| 2019 | 427 | #632 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 432 | #620 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 432 | #611 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 378 | #676 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 377 | #673 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 303 | #772 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 242 | #873 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 267 | #821 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 241 | #872 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 219 | #920 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 241 | #876 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 223 | #918 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 215 | #921 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 225 | #877 | 5 | #18,178 |
| 2005 | 157 | #1,055 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 165 | #1,002 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 147 | #1,057 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 148 | #1,035 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 137 | #1,058 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 127 | #1,109 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 99 | #1,254 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 84 | #1,384 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 64 | #1,585 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 61 | #1,604 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 43 | #1,964 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 40 | #2,059 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 32 | #2,368 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 30 | #2,428 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 28 | #2,496 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 20 | #3,105 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 27 | #2,431 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 11 | #4,286 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 15 | #3,257 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 13 | #3,522 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 11 | #3,900 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 14 | #3,168 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 11 | #3,719 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 13 | #3,373 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 16 | #2,821 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 21 | #2,397 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 22 | #2,267 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 22 | #2,151 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 11 | #3,466 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 14 | #2,875 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 17 | #2,486 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 9 | #3,672 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 8 | #3,839 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 24 | #1,843 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 15 | #2,495 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 11 | #2,967 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 16 | #2,175 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 9 | #2,983 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 11 | #2,536 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 14 | #2,174 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 14 | #2,213 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 12 | #2,471 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 18 | #1,923 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 17 | #1,996 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 18 | #1,974 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 14 | #2,260 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 27 | #1,537 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 15 | #2,128 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 23 | #1,695 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 16 | #2,042 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 22 | #1,658 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 37 | #1,233 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 20 | #1,735 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 28 | #1,443 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 35 | #1,251 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 31 | #1,300 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 37 | #1,171 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 34 | #1,239 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 31 | #1,329 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 28 | #1,341 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 33 | #1,148 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 28 | #1,269 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 29 | #1,292 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 26 | #1,371 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 18 | #1,658 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 22 | #1,450 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 24 | #1,374 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 29 | #1,232 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 31 | #1,196 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 25 | #1,342 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 32 | #1,178 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 22 | #1,479 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 24 | #1,380 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 34 | #1,163 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 25 | #1,409 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 32 | #1,267 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 42 | #1,064 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 28 | #1,399 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 37 | #1,187 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 32 | #1,285 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 37 | #1,173 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 44 | #1,080 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 51 | #966 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 42 | #1,094 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 35 | #1,242 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 47 | #1,009 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 44 | #1,027 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 52 | #923 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 46 | #949 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 24 | #1,443 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 32 | #1,151 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 42 | #827 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 29 | #921 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 29 | #825 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 16 | #847 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 14 | #840 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 11 | #920 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 10 | #911 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 18 | #605 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 11 | #783 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 12 | #724 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 13 | #664 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 5 | #1,202 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 12 | #668 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 20 | #542 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 12 | #597 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 13 | #618 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 15 | #529 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 13 | #608 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 16 | #514 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 9 | #758 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 12 | #589 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 13 | #585 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 17 | #435 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 6 | #938 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 16 | #473 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 9 | #720 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 13 | #499 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 7 | #800 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 9 | #670 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 9 | #679 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 15 | #470 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 7 | #794 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 12 | #518 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 11 | #588 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Hezekiah reached #435 in 1891. As a girl name, it reached #16,007 in 2020. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2020s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.