Is Azalea a boy or girl name?
Azalea is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 868 girls and 0 boys were named Azalea, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 10,618 US babies named Azalea were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #358
- Babies named Azalea since 1902
- 10,618
- Most popular year
- 2024
- 868 babies
Boys and girls named Azalea, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 59 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 118 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 127 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 55 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 32 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 81 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 43 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 135 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 162 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 384 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 1,094 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 4,453 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 3,875 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 868 | #358 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 841 | #365 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 782 | #401 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 750 | #420 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 634 | #483 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 579 | #528 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 608 | #512 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 523 | #576 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 524 | #586 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 524 | #580 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 584 | #531 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 446 | #628 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 296 | #893 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 204 | #1,184 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 165 | #1,394 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 136 | #1,641 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 138 | #1,636 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 128 | #1,706 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 121 | #1,725 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 137 | #1,513 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 97 | #1,927 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 94 | #1,927 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 97 | #1,846 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 86 | #1,981 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 60 | #2,514 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 58 | #2,475 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 57 | #2,431 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 56 | #2,361 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 46 | #2,678 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 28 | #3,786 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 33 | #3,374 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 33 | #3,355 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 25 | #4,099 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 25 | #4,071 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 23 | #4,251 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 26 | #3,794 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 20 | #4,329 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 19 | #4,299 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 11 | #6,204 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 14 | #5,099 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 13 | #5,237 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 15 | #4,700 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 12 | #5,566 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 21 | #3,751 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 11 | #5,942 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 14 | #4,863 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 19 | #3,787 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,247 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 17 | #3,824 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 15 | #4,157 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 19 | #3,438 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 11 | #4,898 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 7 | #6,619 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 9 | #5,582 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 8 | #5,857 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 11 | #4,449 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 6 | #6,083 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 8 | #5,032 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,284 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 8 | #4,796 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 5 | #6,161 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,834 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 6 | #5,255 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,801 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,520 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 8 | #4,149 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,295 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,242 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,294 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,465 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,055 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,675 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 6 | #3,993 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,304 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,473 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,302 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,126 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 9 | #2,942 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,338 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,064 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,517 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,448 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,968 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,870 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,581 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,957 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,164 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,147 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,495 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,205 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,712 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,398 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,890 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,323 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,038 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,551 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 9 | #2,454 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 13 | #1,681 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,857 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 6 | #2,224 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,447 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,620 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,267 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,099 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,160 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,720 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,674 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,817 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,457 |
Highest rank
Azalea has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #358 in 2024. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2020s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Azalea
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.