Is Azalia a boy or girl name?
Azalia is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 95 girls and 0 boys were named Azalia, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 2,250 US babies named Azalia were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #2,035
- Babies named Azalia since 1898
- 2,250
- Most popular year
- 2024
- 95 babies
Boys and girls named Azalia, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 6 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 22 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 54 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 57 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 24 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 24 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 111 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 45 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 122 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 175 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 198 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 426 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 610 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 376 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 95 | #2,035 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 79 | #2,314 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 84 | #2,228 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 74 | #2,420 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 44 | #3,451 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 44 | #3,507 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 49 | #3,251 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 53 | #3,057 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 56 | #2,977 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 67 | #2,652 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 81 | #2,290 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 88 | #2,139 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 49 | #3,322 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 61 | #2,845 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 62 | #2,811 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 50 | #3,311 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 41 | #3,871 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 52 | #3,252 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 45 | #3,513 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 57 | #2,869 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 35 | #4,004 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 50 | #3,006 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 38 | #3,527 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 31 | #4,035 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 27 | #4,418 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 34 | #3,579 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 21 | #4,975 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 31 | #3,633 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 21 | #4,752 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 15 | #5,997 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 20 | #4,864 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 11 | #7,553 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 8 | #9,578 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 21 | #4,669 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 16 | #5,583 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 25 | #3,903 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 15 | #5,351 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 24 | #3,631 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 17 | #4,555 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 12 | #5,707 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,496 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,489 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 21 | #3,789 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 13 | #5,282 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,536 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 12 | #5,452 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,265 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 20 | #3,618 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 5 | #9,404 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 21 | #3,275 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 9 | #5,804 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 10 | #5,219 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 11 | #4,806 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 8 | #6,045 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 10 | #5,082 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 7 | #6,012 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 7 | #5,680 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 7 | #5,489 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 5 | #6,629 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 6 | #5,905 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 6 | #5,896 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 7 | #5,211 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 6 | #5,604 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,713 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 13 | #3,342 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,773 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,737 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,932 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,330 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,703 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,664 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,915 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,358 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,234 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,411 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 6 | #3,803 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 6 | #3,881 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 6 | #3,837 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 6 | #3,789 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,784 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,346 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,165 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,932 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,085 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,184 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,120 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,890 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,881 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,903 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 6 | #3,830 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,139 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 5 | #3,233 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 7 | #2,388 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,507 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,982 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,100 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,721 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,701 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,522 |
Highest rank
Azalia has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #1,522 in 1898. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2020s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Azalia
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.