Is Hoyt a boy or girl name?
Hoyt is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 55 boys were named Hoyt, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.1% of the 8,528 US babies named Hoyt were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #2,483
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Hoyt since 1880
- 8,528
- Most popular year
- 1922
- 176 babies
Boys and girls named Hoyt, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 53 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 110 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 183 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 976 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 1,553 | 10 | 0.6% |
| 1930s | 1,251 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 929 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 718 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 557 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 267 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 168 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 129 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 305 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 959 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 360 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 55 | #2,483 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 64 | #2,230 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 86 | #1,856 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 82 | #1,873 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 73 | #1,969 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 86 | #1,797 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 93 | #1,691 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 100 | #1,605 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 107 | #1,546 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 124 | #1,389 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 94 | #1,646 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 101 | #1,559 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 95 | #1,629 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 81 | #1,787 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 78 | #1,859 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 54 | #2,389 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 51 | #2,486 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 45 | #2,700 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 37 | #2,997 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 32 | #3,190 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 26 | #3,569 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 15 | #5,129 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 15 | #4,996 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 19 | #4,186 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 11 | #6,063 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 16 | #4,434 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 14 | #4,739 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 19 | #3,654 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 8 | #6,730 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 11 | #5,285 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 13 | #4,625 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 9 | #5,936 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 11 | #5,015 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 15 | #3,890 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 13 | #4,260 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 10 | #4,963 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 15 | #3,419 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 27 | #2,186 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 9 | #4,618 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 30 | #1,934 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 9 | #4,344 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 20 | #2,445 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 13 | #3,376 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 19 | #2,527 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 16 | #2,878 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 22 | #2,268 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 12 | #3,286 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 25 | #1,965 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 24 | #2,021 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 27 | #1,809 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 29 | #1,673 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 27 | #1,715 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 32 | #1,522 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 31 | #1,574 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 38 | #1,358 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 49 | #1,116 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 47 | #1,092 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 58 | #951 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 63 | #921 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 69 | #884 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 50 | #1,076 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 49 | #1,098 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 61 | #977 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 60 | #1,008 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 51 | #1,088 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 68 | #932 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 48 | #1,107 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 70 | #912 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 57 | #995 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 81 | #815 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 85 | #776 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 79 | #809 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 70 | #838 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 89 | #738 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 71 | #810 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 83 | #757 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 93 | #695 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 89 | #730 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 100 | #646 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 77 | #693 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 98 | #621 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 94 | #663 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 111 | #595 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 96 | #617 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 88 | #637 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 102 | #567 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 123 | #523 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 109 | #557 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 115 | #535 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 125 | #514 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 115 | #551 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 124 | #504 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 144 | #479 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 132 | #499 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 162 | #466 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 147 | #485 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 141 | #509 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 145 | #502 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 154 | #485 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 140 | #518 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 171 | #474 | 5 | #5,421 |
| 1923 | 167 | #471 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 171 | #471 | 5 | #5,347 |
| 1921 | 153 | #498 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 164 | #476 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 153 | #483 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 161 | #466 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 141 | #484 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 123 | #512 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 117 | #516 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 90 | #517 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 79 | #488 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 49 | #574 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 37 | #485 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 26 | #561 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 34 | #429 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 25 | #505 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 24 | #481 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 19 | #531 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 13 | #685 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 14 | #629 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 12 | #674 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 12 | #669 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 19 | #443 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 11 | #812 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 10 | #679 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 13 | #619 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 9 | #755 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 11 | #698 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 12 | #624 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 7 | #909 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 6 | #963 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 15 | #532 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 13 | #510 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 14 | #521 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 5 | #1,035 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 10 | #609 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 7 | #802 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 6 | #878 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 8 | #724 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 6 | #839 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 6 | #890 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 5 | #979 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Hoyt reached #429 in 1909. As a girl name, it reached #5,347 in 1922. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.