Is Warner a boy or girl name?
Warner is mostly a boy name in the US. In 2024, 7 girls and 119 boys were named Warner, so 5.6% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.8% of the 8,488 US babies named Warner were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #1,502
- Girl rank, 2024
- #13,341
- Babies named Warner since 1880
- 8,488
- Most popular year
- 1921
- 167 babies
Boys and girls named Warner, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 168 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 191 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 189 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 728 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 1,186 | 6 | 0.5% |
| 1930s | 1,316 | 11 | 0.8% |
| 1940s | 822 | 10 | 1.2% |
| 1950s | 624 | 12 | 1.9% |
| 1960s | 539 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 304 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 265 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 229 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 403 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 825 | 21 | 2.5% |
| 2020s | 627 | 12 | 1.9% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 119 | #1,502 | 7 | #13,341 |
| 2023 | 128 | #1,428 | 5 | #17,451 |
| 2022 | 127 | #1,438 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 139 | #1,337 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 114 | #1,494 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 102 | #1,622 | 6 | #15,434 |
| 2018 | 135 | #1,342 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 113 | #1,497 | 5 | #18,298 |
| 2016 | 83 | #1,826 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 78 | #1,891 | 5 | #18,960 |
| 2014 | 70 | #2,042 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 57 | #2,276 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 74 | #1,939 | 5 | #19,389 |
| 2011 | 48 | #2,586 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 65 | #2,096 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 59 | #2,250 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 49 | #2,581 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 37 | #3,130 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 41 | #2,829 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 37 | #2,900 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 37 | #2,838 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 44 | #2,425 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 33 | #2,879 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 37 | #2,616 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 29 | #3,071 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 25 | #3,273 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 19 | #3,840 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 17 | #4,050 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 25 | #3,015 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 17 | #3,843 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 23 | #3,104 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 31 | #2,454 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 26 | #2,743 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 19 | #3,320 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 27 | #2,551 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 26 | #2,540 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 30 | #2,141 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 19 | #2,833 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 25 | #2,284 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 21 | #2,503 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 22 | #2,361 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 30 | #1,862 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 26 | #2,106 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 33 | #1,764 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 33 | #1,764 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 24 | #2,153 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 29 | #1,832 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 23 | #2,128 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 24 | #2,052 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 34 | #1,559 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 24 | #1,932 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 30 | #1,610 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 35 | #1,451 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 40 | #1,351 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 41 | #1,312 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 40 | #1,264 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 29 | #1,477 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 49 | #1,058 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 48 | #1,072 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 45 | #1,127 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 49 | #1,093 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 70 | #898 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 81 | #845 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 63 | #979 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 65 | #943 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 60 | #1,002 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 70 | #905 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 52 | #1,063 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 67 | #916 | 7 | #5,314 |
| 1955 | 65 | #932 | 5 | #6,709 |
| 1954 | 57 | #992 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 68 | #877 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 79 | #793 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 53 | #969 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 53 | #958 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 68 | #833 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 78 | #773 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 81 | #768 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 73 | #780 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 75 | #707 | 5 | #5,218 |
| 1944 | 81 | #696 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 88 | #690 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 81 | #717 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 88 | #652 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 109 | #573 | 5 | #5,004 |
| 1939 | 118 | #529 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 135 | #501 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 147 | #461 | 6 | #4,243 |
| 1936 | 136 | #486 | 5 | #4,834 |
| 1935 | 165 | #445 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 160 | #446 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 130 | #493 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 124 | #523 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 96 | #604 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 105 | #590 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 118 | #542 | 6 | #4,548 |
| 1928 | 91 | #660 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 92 | #667 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 103 | #620 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 93 | #667 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 125 | #574 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 117 | #581 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 122 | #582 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 167 | #474 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 158 | #483 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 107 | #583 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 108 | #588 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 91 | #622 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 111 | #544 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 86 | #628 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 73 | #590 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 61 | #559 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 52 | #560 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 20 | #731 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 19 | #704 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 21 | #588 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 19 | #611 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 26 | #463 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 17 | #589 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 17 | #591 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 22 | #465 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 24 | #410 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 10 | #790 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 13 | #593 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 20 | #553 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 25 | #375 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 21 | #450 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 15 | #552 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 25 | #398 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 13 | #607 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 16 | #520 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 15 | #506 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 24 | #393 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 15 | #475 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 22 | #387 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 23 | #378 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 23 | #397 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 12 | #540 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 18 | #430 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 17 | #461 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 22 | #384 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 18 | #432 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 15 | #488 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 10 | #590 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 10 | #637 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Warner reached #375 in 1899. As a girl name, it reached #4,243 in 1937. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1920s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Warner
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.