Is Hulda a boy or girl name?
Hulda was a girl name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 5,407 US babies named Hulda were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Hulda since 1880
- 5,407
- Most popular year
- 1895
- 167 babies
Boys and girls named Hulda, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 899 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 1,374 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 903 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 1,060 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 709 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 240 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 130 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 69 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 11 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 7 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 5 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | – |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 5 | #10,951 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 7 | #7,577 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 6 | #6,067 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 5 | #6,941 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,275 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,181 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,821 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 8 | #4,375 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,656 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,853 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,131 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,727 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,885 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,552 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,343 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,809 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,448 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,384 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,348 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,714 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,631 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,757 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,722 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,128 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 16 | #1,977 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,693 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,734 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,420 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,332 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,249 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,280 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,165 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,151 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,103 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 64 | #933 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 71 | #880 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 70 | #909 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 82 | #805 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 95 | #751 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 101 | #734 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 93 | #755 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 131 | #613 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 101 | #719 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 124 | #614 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 148 | #546 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 131 | #563 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 98 | #573 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 92 | #532 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 84 | #532 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 76 | #474 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 75 | #462 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 76 | #422 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 66 | #445 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 86 | #384 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 75 | #398 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 97 | #346 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 92 | #340 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 108 | #303 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 89 | #333 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 104 | #299 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 110 | #322 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 118 | #262 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 138 | #254 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 130 | #249 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 129 | #252 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 167 | #207 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 144 | #222 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 137 | #222 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 126 | #233 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 138 | #196 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 147 | #197 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 139 | #192 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 126 | #200 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 108 | #194 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 85 | #215 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 113 | #171 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 86 | #202 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 71 | #208 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 67 | #203 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 44 | #236 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 60 | #200 |
Highest rank
Hulda has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #171 in 1885. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1890s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Hulda
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.