Is Jacinta a boy or girl name?
Jacinta is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 29 girls and 0 boys were named Jacinta, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 3,514 US babies named Jacinta were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #4,689
- Babies named Jacinta since 1909
- 3,514
- Most popular year
- 1982
- 104 babies
Boys and girls named Jacinta, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 5 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 44 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 76 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 53 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 89 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 262 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 293 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 708 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 798 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 446 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 306 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 270 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 164 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 29 | #4,689 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 37 | #4,007 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 34 | #4,239 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 30 | #4,550 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 34 | #4,106 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 27 | #4,963 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 32 | #4,400 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 54 | #3,029 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,697 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 33 | #4,340 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 26 | #5,217 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 14 | #8,303 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 20 | #6,435 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 22 | #6,020 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,748 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,971 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 21 | #6,429 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,969 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 32 | #4,506 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 34 | #4,150 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 22 | #5,636 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 40 | #3,550 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 29 | #4,323 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 42 | #3,272 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 40 | #3,357 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 28 | #4,128 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 30 | #3,870 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 38 | #3,126 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 46 | #2,689 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 50 | #2,528 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 42 | #2,859 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 40 | #2,955 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 56 | #2,330 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 66 | #2,064 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 50 | #2,446 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 68 | #1,916 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 71 | #1,773 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 58 | #1,951 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 78 | #1,555 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 75 | #1,594 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 86 | #1,375 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 75 | #1,515 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 104 | #1,252 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 99 | #1,288 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 84 | #1,448 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 92 | #1,342 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 82 | #1,413 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 72 | #1,520 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 59 | #1,666 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 76 | #1,387 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 67 | #1,477 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 67 | #1,446 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 77 | #1,318 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 58 | #1,615 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 58 | #1,623 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 62 | #1,506 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,584 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 22 | #2,661 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 22 | #2,614 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 21 | #2,701 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 26 | #2,433 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 16 | #3,233 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,969 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,571 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 30 | #2,119 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,897 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,956 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 27 | #2,134 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 24 | #2,283 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,768 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,810 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,944 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 25 | #2,041 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,275 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 21 | #2,152 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 22 | #2,091 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,752 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,557 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,661 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,813 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,963 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,900 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,741 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,651 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 6 | #3,980 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,640 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,237 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,508 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,609 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,506 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,095 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,185 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,499 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,449 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,411 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,724 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,023 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,885 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,456 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,153 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,177 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,325 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,604 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 9 | #2,523 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 7 | #2,667 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 5 | #3,184 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,365 |
Highest rank
Jacinta has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #1,252 in 1982. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1980s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Jacinta
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.