Is Jacinto a boy or girl name?
Jacinto is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 45 boys were named Jacinto, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 2,914 US babies named Jacinto were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #2,839
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Jacinto since 1909
- 2,914
- Most popular year
- 2024
- 45 babies
Boys and girls named Jacinto, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 6 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 65 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 209 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 174 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 229 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 241 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 288 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 312 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 353 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 347 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 310 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 217 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 163 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 45 | #2,839 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 43 | #2,911 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 37 | #3,239 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 19 | #5,001 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 19 | #4,925 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 19 | #5,032 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 14 | #6,154 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 20 | #4,821 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 26 | #4,040 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 23 | #4,342 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 26 | #3,944 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 26 | #3,900 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 23 | #4,307 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 19 | #4,886 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 21 | #4,583 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 25 | #4,082 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 25 | #4,077 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 26 | #3,939 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 35 | #3,111 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 33 | #3,116 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 25 | #3,684 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 30 | #3,146 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 34 | #2,782 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 39 | #2,507 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 38 | #2,499 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 30 | #2,824 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 32 | #2,616 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 32 | #2,518 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 31 | #2,504 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 31 | #2,466 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 36 | #2,234 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 41 | #1,976 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 35 | #2,192 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 36 | #2,070 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 43 | #1,822 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 41 | #1,843 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 34 | #1,926 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 34 | #1,879 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 28 | #2,072 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 41 | #1,578 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 41 | #1,514 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 35 | #1,671 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 31 | #1,831 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 36 | #1,645 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 32 | #1,782 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 28 | #1,923 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 24 | #2,034 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 32 | #1,686 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 40 | #1,418 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 26 | #1,854 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 29 | #1,674 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 29 | #1,623 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 38 | #1,372 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 33 | #1,506 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 33 | #1,478 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 36 | #1,337 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 36 | #1,267 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 27 | #1,488 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 26 | #1,525 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 28 | #1,468 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 34 | #1,360 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 22 | #1,720 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 27 | #1,531 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 31 | #1,447 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 21 | #1,791 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 25 | #1,606 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 22 | #1,705 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 27 | #1,529 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 20 | #1,780 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 26 | #1,519 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 14 | #2,158 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 33 | #1,319 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 23 | #1,598 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 20 | #1,702 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 31 | #1,301 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 25 | #1,479 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 26 | #1,442 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 13 | #2,202 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 30 | #1,286 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 16 | #1,730 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 31 | #1,201 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 28 | #1,327 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 21 | #1,559 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 13 | #2,042 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 26 | #1,321 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 17 | #1,673 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 13 | #2,035 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 19 | #1,603 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 16 | #1,757 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 22 | #1,470 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 18 | #1,697 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 14 | #1,958 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 18 | #1,747 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 20 | #1,610 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 17 | #1,861 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 20 | #1,703 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 23 | #1,585 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 19 | #1,839 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 20 | #1,757 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 31 | #1,319 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 18 | #1,934 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 23 | #1,621 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 16 | #2,097 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 14 | #2,310 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 25 | #1,527 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 13 | #2,323 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 11 | #2,619 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 8 | #3,059 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 9 | #2,821 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 5 | #4,094 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 7 | #2,787 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 6 | #2,414 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 6 | #1,503 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 6 | #1,372 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Jacinto reached #1,201 in 1944. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2020s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Jacinto
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.