Is Jacques a boy or girl name?
Jacques is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 59 boys were named Jacques, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 2.4% of the 9,894 US babies named Jacques were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #2,375
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Jacques since 1888
- 9,894
- Most popular year
- 1990
- 180 babies
Boys and girls named Jacques, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 6 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 14 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 14 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 204 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 418 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 307 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 413 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 800 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 1,221 | 19 | 1.5% |
| 1970s | 1,307 | 50 | 3.7% |
| 1980s | 1,337 | 98 | 6.8% |
| 1990s | 1,464 | 70 | 4.6% |
| 2000s | 1,081 | 5 | 0.5% |
| 2010s | 768 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 298 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 59 | #2,375 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 56 | #2,422 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 53 | #2,572 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 62 | #2,260 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 68 | #2,077 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 67 | #2,140 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 78 | #1,906 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 67 | #2,077 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 72 | #1,998 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 90 | #1,724 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 70 | #2,028 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 73 | #1,923 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 72 | #1,970 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 87 | #1,707 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 92 | #1,680 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 89 | #1,737 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 105 | #1,540 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 90 | #1,689 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 102 | #1,495 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 103 | #1,437 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 98 | #1,436 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 110 | #1,286 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 124 | #1,148 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 131 | #1,091 | 5 | #16,320 |
| 2000 | 129 | #1,093 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 123 | #1,089 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 157 | #914 | 5 | #15,052 |
| 1997 | 156 | #888 | 6 | #12,680 |
| 1996 | 138 | #943 | 6 | #12,427 |
| 1995 | 149 | #900 | 6 | #12,356 |
| 1994 | 135 | #950 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 151 | #862 | 7 | #11,018 |
| 1992 | 139 | #896 | 8 | #9,822 |
| 1991 | 154 | #833 | 14 | #6,367 |
| 1990 | 162 | #797 | 18 | #5,142 |
| 1989 | 136 | #863 | 14 | #5,943 |
| 1988 | 146 | #781 | 27 | #3,513 |
| 1987 | 137 | #790 | 16 | #4,929 |
| 1986 | 125 | #808 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 144 | #737 | 8 | #7,832 |
| 1984 | 130 | #760 | 12 | #5,656 |
| 1983 | 114 | #820 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 121 | #805 | 6 | #9,651 |
| 1981 | 138 | #742 | 8 | #7,657 |
| 1980 | 146 | #727 | 7 | #8,478 |
| 1979 | 126 | #774 | 9 | #6,915 |
| 1978 | 108 | #822 | 7 | #7,937 |
| 1977 | 108 | #820 | 5 | #10,197 |
| 1976 | 105 | #816 | 9 | #6,239 |
| 1975 | 116 | #770 | 5 | #9,598 |
| 1974 | 123 | #734 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 158 | #631 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 155 | #636 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 154 | #666 | 8 | #6,227 |
| 1970 | 154 | #661 | 7 | #6,596 |
| 1969 | 170 | #601 | 6 | #6,948 |
| 1968 | 135 | #651 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 101 | #732 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 108 | #714 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 126 | #662 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 108 | #741 | 6 | #6,298 |
| 1963 | 139 | #663 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 100 | #767 | 7 | #5,508 |
| 1961 | 126 | #683 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 108 | #743 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 106 | #745 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 78 | #859 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 98 | #761 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 72 | #883 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 89 | #776 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 85 | #777 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 79 | #810 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 63 | #890 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 73 | #824 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 57 | #911 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 56 | #929 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 51 | #980 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 67 | #848 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 44 | #1,036 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 37 | #1,066 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 34 | #1,144 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 31 | #1,248 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 33 | #1,223 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 20 | #1,554 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 40 | #1,026 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 28 | #1,253 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 31 | #1,183 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 30 | #1,219 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 21 | #1,485 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 29 | #1,260 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 31 | #1,202 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 34 | #1,136 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 28 | #1,307 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 38 | #1,108 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 37 | #1,162 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 33 | #1,229 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 37 | #1,177 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 42 | #1,104 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 33 | #1,269 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 42 | #1,082 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 52 | #981 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 46 | #1,050 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 44 | #1,065 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 43 | #1,079 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 46 | #1,025 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 38 | #1,134 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 38 | #1,119 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 23 | #1,504 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 22 | #1,531 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 26 | #1,323 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 20 | #1,366 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 12 | #1,630 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 15 | #1,244 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 10 | #1,159 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 6 | #1,168 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 8 | #1,004 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 7 | #937 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 7 | #933 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 6 | #981 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Jacques reached #601 in 1969. As a girl name, it reached #3,513 in 1988. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1990s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Jacques
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.