Is Jacque a boy or girl name?
Jacque was used for both, more often for girls in the US. Across 1880–2024, 66.9% of the 7,303 US babies named Jacque were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Jacque since 1912
- 7,303
- Most popular year
- 1950
- 254 babies
Boys and girls named Jacque, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 82 | 35 | 29.9% |
| 1920s | 235 | 121 | 34% |
| 1930s | 174 | 387 | 69% |
| 1940s | 138 | 747 | 84.4% |
| 1950s | 238 | 1,421 | 85.7% |
| 1960s | 294 | 1,099 | 78.9% |
| 1970s | 314 | 538 | 63.1% |
| 1980s | 350 | 382 | 52.2% |
| 1990s | 251 | 128 | 33.8% |
| 2000s | 178 | 30 | 14.4% |
| 2010s | 125 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 36 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 10 | #7,938 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 11 | #7,458 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 6 | #11,296 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 9 | #8,325 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 11 | #7,352 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 15 | #5,887 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 20 | #4,822 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 14 | #6,160 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 13 | #6,473 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 17 | #5,346 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 8 | #9,125 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 10 | #7,777 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 9 | #8,333 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 8 | #9,125 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 13 | #6,575 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 15 | #5,890 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 24 | #4,174 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 17 | #5,172 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 16 | #5,130 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 23 | #3,921 | 7 | #13,296 |
| 2003 | 17 | #4,689 | 6 | #14,571 |
| 2002 | 20 | #4,093 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 16 | #4,760 | 8 | #11,415 |
| 2000 | 17 | #4,467 | 9 | #10,209 |
| 1999 | 21 | #3,628 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 21 | #3,538 | 7 | #11,612 |
| 1997 | 27 | #2,855 | 5 | #14,616 |
| 1996 | 23 | #3,153 | 5 | #14,359 |
| 1995 | 30 | #2,526 | 10 | #8,322 |
| 1994 | 26 | #2,804 | 12 | #7,278 |
| 1993 | 23 | #2,977 | 20 | #4,887 |
| 1992 | 23 | #2,946 | 14 | #6,433 |
| 1991 | 23 | #2,865 | 25 | #4,112 |
| 1990 | 34 | #2,141 | 30 | #3,557 |
| 1989 | 29 | #2,320 | 28 | #3,603 |
| 1988 | 37 | #1,830 | 34 | #2,999 |
| 1987 | 33 | #1,913 | 40 | #2,542 |
| 1986 | 40 | #1,627 | 32 | #2,932 |
| 1985 | 37 | #1,685 | 34 | #2,758 |
| 1984 | 36 | #1,641 | 30 | #2,945 |
| 1983 | 18 | #2,614 | 33 | #2,689 |
| 1982 | 44 | #1,449 | 46 | #2,195 |
| 1981 | 42 | #1,487 | 47 | #2,169 |
| 1980 | 34 | #1,710 | 58 | #1,872 |
| 1979 | 33 | #1,732 | 52 | #1,984 |
| 1978 | 30 | #1,771 | 61 | #1,712 |
| 1977 | 24 | #2,032 | 50 | #1,959 |
| 1976 | 29 | #1,763 | 54 | #1,754 |
| 1975 | 26 | #1,855 | 44 | #2,000 |
| 1974 | 21 | #2,076 | 44 | #1,942 |
| 1973 | 29 | #1,624 | 40 | #2,035 |
| 1972 | 30 | #1,580 | 63 | #1,506 |
| 1971 | 56 | #1,093 | 73 | #1,431 |
| 1970 | 36 | #1,404 | 57 | #1,643 |
| 1969 | 35 | #1,367 | 82 | #1,238 |
| 1968 | 35 | #1,297 | 70 | #1,330 |
| 1967 | 32 | #1,351 | 82 | #1,176 |
| 1966 | 21 | #1,703 | 91 | #1,106 |
| 1965 | 29 | #1,446 | 91 | #1,099 |
| 1964 | 26 | #1,558 | 111 | #1,023 |
| 1963 | 30 | #1,439 | 117 | #984 |
| 1962 | 26 | #1,567 | 152 | #856 |
| 1961 | 34 | #1,375 | 164 | #823 |
| 1960 | 26 | #1,605 | 139 | #887 |
| 1959 | 39 | #1,254 | 133 | #905 |
| 1958 | 24 | #1,615 | 133 | #885 |
| 1957 | 24 | #1,654 | 108 | #1,004 |
| 1956 | 25 | #1,587 | 124 | #898 |
| 1955 | 21 | #1,704 | 127 | #864 |
| 1954 | 26 | #1,512 | 132 | #818 |
| 1953 | 21 | #1,689 | 121 | #843 |
| 1952 | 18 | #1,828 | 135 | #766 |
| 1951 | 22 | #1,620 | 172 | #668 |
| 1950 | 18 | #1,777 | 236 | #539 |
| 1949 | 14 | #2,067 | 139 | #719 |
| 1948 | 19 | #1,735 | 94 | #897 |
| 1947 | 13 | #2,203 | 99 | #886 |
| 1946 | 16 | #1,849 | 86 | #901 |
| 1945 | 7 | #2,862 | 69 | #908 |
| 1944 | 10 | #2,380 | 50 | #1,110 |
| 1943 | 21 | #1,555 | 65 | #987 |
| 1942 | 20 | #1,606 | 50 | #1,119 |
| 1941 | 13 | #2,043 | 52 | #1,014 |
| 1940 | 5 | #3,691 | 43 | #1,108 |
| 1939 | 17 | #1,674 | 54 | #967 |
| 1938 | 18 | #1,646 | 49 | #1,024 |
| 1937 | 17 | #1,721 | 41 | #1,122 |
| 1936 | 17 | #1,682 | 51 | #964 |
| 1935 | 9 | #2,622 | 43 | #1,062 |
| 1934 | 13 | #2,072 | 42 | #1,087 |
| 1933 | 18 | #1,677 | 31 | #1,295 |
| 1932 | 21 | #1,561 | 30 | #1,362 |
| 1931 | 23 | #1,472 | 20 | #1,774 |
| 1930 | 21 | #1,624 | 26 | #1,550 |
| 1929 | 21 | #1,643 | 15 | #2,242 |
| 1928 | 24 | #1,543 | 17 | #2,138 |
| 1927 | 28 | #1,422 | 22 | #1,845 |
| 1926 | 30 | #1,343 | 13 | #2,627 |
| 1925 | 33 | #1,268 | 14 | #2,546 |
| 1924 | 26 | #1,512 | 15 | #2,459 |
| 1923 | 21 | #1,720 | 11 | #3,013 |
| 1922 | 20 | #1,792 | 6 | #4,706 |
| 1921 | 16 | #2,109 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 16 | #2,092 | 8 | #3,776 |
| 1919 | 14 | #2,202 | 10 | #3,104 |
| 1918 | 16 | #2,033 | 7 | #4,060 |
| 1917 | 8 | #3,060 | 6 | #4,326 |
| 1916 | 11 | #2,462 | 7 | #3,714 |
| 1915 | 13 | #2,121 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 9 | #2,356 | 5 | #3,889 |
| 1913 | 6 | #2,640 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 5 | #2,716 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Jacque reached #1,093 in 1971. As a girl name, it reached #539 in 1950. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1950s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Jacque
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.