Is Stanton a boy or girl name?
Stanton is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 20 boys were named Stanton, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 6,708 US babies named Stanton were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #5,013
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Stanton since 1880
- 6,708
- Most popular year
- 1954
- 115 babies
Boys and girls named Stanton, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 33 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 47 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 49 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 467 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 781 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 643 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 786 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 980 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 704 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 476 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 501 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 522 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 279 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 309 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 131 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 20 | #5,013 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 27 | #4,096 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 36 | #3,326 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 26 | #4,105 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 22 | #4,518 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 35 | #3,333 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 29 | #3,779 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 32 | #3,508 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 43 | #2,829 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 28 | #3,865 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 34 | #3,291 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 29 | #3,649 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 33 | #3,355 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 27 | #3,877 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 19 | #5,011 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 25 | #4,145 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 35 | #3,270 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 21 | #4,618 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 26 | #3,871 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 22 | #4,168 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 30 | #3,274 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 25 | #3,615 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 22 | #3,896 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 36 | #2,674 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 37 | #2,571 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 40 | #2,297 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 35 | #2,498 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 50 | #1,880 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 41 | #2,108 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 58 | #1,599 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 58 | #1,605 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 48 | #1,789 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 78 | #1,286 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 61 | #1,465 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 53 | #1,582 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 57 | #1,472 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 54 | #1,446 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 54 | #1,377 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 58 | #1,282 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 53 | #1,330 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 51 | #1,317 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 54 | #1,264 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 48 | #1,381 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 43 | #1,476 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 29 | #1,958 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 39 | #1,530 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 53 | #1,238 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 33 | #1,665 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 32 | #1,673 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 44 | #1,320 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 38 | #1,406 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 58 | #1,073 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 53 | #1,129 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 64 | #1,025 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 62 | #1,040 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 74 | #892 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 66 | #892 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 65 | #897 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 46 | #1,098 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 67 | #912 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 63 | #963 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 88 | #812 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 78 | #860 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 76 | #881 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 81 | #840 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 78 | #869 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 84 | #823 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 95 | #774 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 89 | #791 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 96 | #752 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 115 | #674 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 99 | #722 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 109 | #667 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 107 | #676 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 108 | #671 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 112 | #647 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 80 | #758 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 104 | #681 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 86 | #703 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 71 | #732 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 61 | #808 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 60 | #867 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 73 | #753 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 68 | #757 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 71 | #728 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 58 | #803 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 66 | #755 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 63 | #778 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 63 | #774 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 61 | #795 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 60 | #807 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 72 | #718 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 76 | #718 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 68 | #755 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 56 | #890 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 76 | #720 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 72 | #766 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 94 | #657 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 76 | #736 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 77 | #754 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 91 | #685 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 70 | #801 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 65 | #853 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 69 | #832 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 91 | #673 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 69 | #781 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 72 | #771 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 69 | #759 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 51 | #887 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 58 | #803 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 54 | #710 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 43 | #706 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 25 | #911 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 13 | #970 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 13 | #921 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 8 | #1,145 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 10 | #941 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 11 | #858 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 6 | #1,234 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 6 | #1,187 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 8 | #849 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 5 | #1,187 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 6 | #1,106 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 6 | #1,046 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 8 | #825 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 5 | #1,236 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 8 | #758 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 9 | #732 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 5 | #1,097 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 6 | #1,019 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 5 | #1,106 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 5 | #1,078 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 6 | #852 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 6 | #899 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Stanton reached #647 in 1949. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1950s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Stanton
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.