Is Rogers a boy or girl name?
Rogers was a boy name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 0.3% of the 7,050 US babies named Rogers were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Rogers since 1883
- 7,050
- Most popular year
- 1950
- 169 babies
Boys and girls named Rogers, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 28 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 85 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 131 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 624 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 1,060 | 6 | 0.6% |
| 1930s | 1,113 | 5 | 0.4% |
| 1940s | 1,271 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 1,222 | 10 | 0.8% |
| 1960s | 587 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 353 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 270 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 111 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 88 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 71 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 15 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 5 | #13,755 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 5 | #13,684 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 5 | #13,649 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 8 | #9,573 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 10 | #8,015 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 7 | #10,512 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 8 | #9,403 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 7 | #10,497 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 10 | #7,977 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 6 | #11,964 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 8 | #9,426 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 7 | #10,528 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 7 | #10,735 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 10 | #8,173 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 6 | #12,064 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 8 | #9,391 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 11 | #7,016 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 13 | #6,073 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 5 | #12,369 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 9 | #7,506 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 10 | #6,836 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 9 | #7,283 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 9 | #6,982 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 9 | #6,730 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 6 | #9,033 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 12 | #5,122 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 8 | #6,856 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 7 | #7,596 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 13 | #4,645 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 17 | #3,715 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 14 | #4,180 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 16 | #3,744 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 21 | #2,977 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 23 | #2,580 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 19 | #2,813 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 26 | #2,213 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 28 | #2,058 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 29 | #1,924 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 26 | #2,069 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 29 | #1,926 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 37 | #1,627 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 32 | #1,796 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 28 | #1,933 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 31 | #1,747 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 31 | #1,736 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 31 | #1,700 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 29 | #1,747 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 30 | #1,653 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 46 | #1,230 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 46 | #1,225 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 36 | #1,434 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 45 | #1,250 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 45 | #1,182 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 47 | #1,097 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 40 | #1,197 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 59 | #949 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 61 | #946 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 52 | #1,056 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 47 | #1,136 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 76 | #878 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 82 | #849 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 78 | #865 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 74 | #895 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 92 | #784 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 88 | #802 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 103 | #725 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 116 | #683 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 132 | #639 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 157 | #570 | 5 | #6,356 |
| 1952 | 142 | #588 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 154 | #550 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 164 | #527 | 5 | #5,947 |
| 1949 | 148 | #552 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 146 | #555 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 133 | #593 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 135 | #551 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 124 | #538 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 124 | #546 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 110 | #603 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 125 | #551 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 113 | #567 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 113 | #559 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 112 | #541 | 5 | #4,816 |
| 1938 | 102 | #582 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 132 | #502 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 104 | #565 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 118 | #533 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 101 | #588 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 120 | #518 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 95 | #612 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 115 | #547 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 114 | #562 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 110 | #569 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 100 | #611 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 108 | #599 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 113 | #593 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 93 | #666 | 6 | #4,867 |
| 1924 | 99 | #646 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 122 | #569 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 110 | #616 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 117 | #588 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 88 | #684 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 98 | #615 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 88 | #663 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 105 | #579 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 70 | #722 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 83 | #641 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 53 | #721 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 46 | #666 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 39 | #688 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 23 | #660 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 19 | #702 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 26 | #516 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 11 | #868 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 14 | #729 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 13 | #699 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 9 | #906 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 15 | #607 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 9 | #834 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 20 | #484 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 6 | #1,036 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 8 | #1,035 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 16 | #497 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 5 | #1,267 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 11 | #671 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 5 | #1,236 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 13 | #602 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 6 | #1,009 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 8 | #848 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 12 | #556 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 9 | #726 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 10 | #690 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 5 | #1,081 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 6 | #922 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 7 | #788 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Rogers reached #484 in 1902. As a girl name, it reached #4,816 in 1939. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1950s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Rogers
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.