Is Rogelio a boy or girl name?
Rogelio is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 182 boys were named Rogelio, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.3% of the 25,758 US babies named Rogelio were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #1,153
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Rogelio since 1914
- 25,758
- Most popular year
- 2005
- 548 babies
Boys and girls named Rogelio, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 49 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 314 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 487 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 943 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 1,583 | 5 | 0.3% |
| 1960s | 1,867 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 3,110 | 16 | 0.5% |
| 1980s | 3,934 | 32 | 0.8% |
| 1990s | 4,779 | 12 | 0.3% |
| 2000s | 4,835 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 2,756 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 1,036 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 182 | #1,153 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 206 | #1,057 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 218 | #1,021 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 217 | #1,013 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 213 | #998 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 198 | #1,043 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 239 | #905 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 244 | #882 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 261 | #864 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 268 | #840 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 295 | #784 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 318 | #736 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 324 | #725 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 289 | #779 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 320 | #719 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 352 | #690 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 451 | #572 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 506 | #519 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 497 | #521 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 548 | #464 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 533 | #473 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 505 | #489 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 487 | #479 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 466 | #493 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 490 | #481 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 445 | #494 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 451 | #484 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 474 | #464 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 465 | #472 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 474 | #468 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 480 | #458 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 500 | #440 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 511 | #433 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 474 | #454 | 7 | #11,212 |
| 1990 | 505 | #439 | 5 | #14,695 |
| 1989 | 475 | #434 | 5 | #13,981 |
| 1988 | 384 | #466 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 409 | #438 | 6 | #10,938 |
| 1986 | 379 | #444 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 388 | #433 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 359 | #445 | 10 | #6,658 |
| 1983 | 333 | #453 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 395 | #422 | 5 | #11,856 |
| 1981 | 409 | #403 | 6 | #10,068 |
| 1980 | 403 | #405 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 377 | #407 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 325 | #440 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 352 | #421 | 7 | #8,201 |
| 1976 | 337 | #424 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 318 | #448 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 332 | #434 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 271 | #477 | 9 | #5,943 |
| 1972 | 282 | #468 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 254 | #512 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 262 | #499 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 256 | #478 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 223 | #507 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 179 | #559 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 201 | #538 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 161 | #602 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 177 | #595 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 163 | #613 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 181 | #581 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 149 | #643 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 177 | #586 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 194 | #556 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 142 | #646 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 162 | #603 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 152 | #617 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 145 | #618 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 147 | #610 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 169 | #546 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 183 | #516 | 5 | #6,240 |
| 1951 | 129 | #622 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 160 | #540 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 134 | #584 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 128 | #595 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 118 | #635 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 100 | #648 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 96 | #621 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 98 | #622 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 74 | #760 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 65 | #805 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 69 | #750 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 61 | #799 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 63 | #769 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 44 | #960 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 46 | #929 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 56 | #823 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 42 | #987 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 56 | #839 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 47 | #921 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 39 | #1,089 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 48 | #957 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 46 | #1,019 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 47 | #993 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 40 | #1,120 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 40 | #1,144 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 41 | #1,121 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 37 | #1,181 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 27 | #1,483 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 26 | #1,488 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 21 | #1,749 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 15 | #2,246 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 20 | #1,808 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 11 | #2,634 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 12 | #2,510 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 6 | #3,899 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 10 | #2,698 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 5 | #4,294 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 5 | #3,664 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Rogelio reached #403 in 1981. As a girl name, it reached #5,943 in 1973. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2000s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Rogelio
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.