Is Rosalio a boy or girl name?
Rosalio is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 10 boys were named Rosalio, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.2% of the 2,052 US babies named Rosalio were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #8,172
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Rosalio since 1911
- 2,052
- Most popular year
- 1994
- 39 babies
Boys and girls named Rosalio, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 84 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 229 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 182 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 180 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 206 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 161 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 203 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 236 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 253 | 5 | 1.9% |
| 2000s | 178 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 93 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 42 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 10 | #8,172 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 12 | #7,204 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 14 | #6,403 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 6 | #11,850 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 10 | #8,087 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 6 | #11,861 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 9 | #8,692 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 12 | #7,058 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 7 | #10,402 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 6 | #11,838 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 8 | #9,488 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 6 | #11,974 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 9 | #8,635 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 20 | #4,808 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 11 | #7,595 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 16 | #5,717 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 17 | #5,393 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 22 | #4,338 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 16 | #5,231 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 19 | #4,561 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 18 | #4,577 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 16 | #4,865 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 16 | #4,846 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 27 | #3,209 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 22 | #3,566 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 20 | #3,682 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 25 | #3,047 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 26 | #2,897 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 22 | #3,170 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 39 | #2,116 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 29 | #2,567 | 5 | #15,244 |
| 1992 | 23 | #2,983 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 22 | #2,968 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 25 | #2,682 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 25 | #2,597 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 14 | #3,670 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 24 | #2,387 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 20 | #2,673 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 18 | #2,803 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 19 | #2,603 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 30 | #1,857 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 28 | #1,982 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 30 | #1,892 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 28 | #1,996 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 23 | #2,221 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 28 | #1,860 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 22 | #2,193 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 21 | #2,225 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 25 | #1,934 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 20 | #2,183 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 16 | #2,487 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 10 | #3,296 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 18 | #2,260 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 20 | #2,046 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 14 | #2,398 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 13 | #2,425 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 10 | #2,738 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 15 | #2,116 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 16 | #2,062 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 16 | #2,099 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 19 | #1,886 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 16 | #2,102 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 23 | #1,727 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 19 | #1,901 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 19 | #1,907 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 18 | #1,948 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 12 | #2,471 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 30 | #1,438 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 14 | #2,205 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 23 | #1,620 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 20 | #1,758 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 20 | #1,742 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 21 | #1,674 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 29 | #1,362 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 9 | #2,768 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 15 | #2,011 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 24 | #1,550 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 13 | #2,125 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 11 | #2,221 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 21 | #1,518 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 15 | #1,979 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 19 | #1,673 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 25 | #1,367 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 28 | #1,287 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 11 | #2,263 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 19 | #1,607 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 15 | #1,902 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 19 | #1,581 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 15 | #1,903 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 12 | #2,238 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 22 | #1,496 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 19 | #1,703 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 24 | #1,451 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 26 | #1,459 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 20 | #1,715 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 33 | #1,266 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 20 | #1,785 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 31 | #1,325 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 20 | #1,792 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 29 | #1,404 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 21 | #1,745 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 20 | #1,817 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 14 | #2,355 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 21 | #1,734 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 14 | #2,239 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 13 | #2,370 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 15 | #2,070 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 9 | #2,895 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 8 | #3,026 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 8 | #2,234 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 12 | #1,514 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 5 | #1,952 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Rosalio reached #1,266 in 1928. As a girl name, it reached #15,244 in 1993. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1990s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Rosalio
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.