Is Kerwin a boy or girl name?
Kerwin is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 12 boys were named Kerwin, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0% of the 2,465 US babies named Kerwin were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #7,031
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Kerwin since 1913
- 2,465
- Most popular year
- 1959
- 89 babies
Boys and girls named Kerwin, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 33 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 71 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 84 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 113 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 384 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 559 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 318 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 332 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 228 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 189 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 111 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 43 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 12 | #7,031 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 6 | #11,576 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 5 | #13,379 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 12 | #6,907 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 8 | #9,156 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 7 | #10,316 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 9 | #8,519 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 15 | #5,945 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 8 | #9,302 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 10 | #7,790 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 7 | #10,224 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 14 | #6,091 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 13 | #6,505 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 12 | #6,820 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 16 | #5,619 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 14 | #6,289 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 20 | #4,825 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 16 | #5,567 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 18 | #4,965 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 21 | #4,272 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 18 | #4,696 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 20 | #4,205 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 13 | #5,575 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 25 | #3,463 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 24 | #3,481 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 23 | #3,442 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 19 | #3,786 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 20 | #3,529 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 27 | #2,795 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 15 | #4,171 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 14 | #4,420 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 18 | #3,579 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 32 | #2,338 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 28 | #2,510 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 32 | #2,240 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 32 | #2,179 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 39 | #1,783 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 31 | #1,998 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 27 | #2,134 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 29 | #1,994 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 36 | #1,646 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 34 | #1,704 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 38 | #1,612 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 31 | #1,837 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 35 | #1,677 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 36 | #1,614 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 37 | #1,553 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 31 | #1,723 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 25 | #1,964 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 24 | #1,976 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 27 | #1,766 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 32 | #1,529 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 32 | #1,525 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 34 | #1,479 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 40 | #1,322 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 47 | #1,143 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 43 | #1,160 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 40 | #1,191 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 46 | #1,095 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 52 | #1,028 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 54 | #1,031 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 69 | #903 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 67 | #927 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 66 | #943 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 75 | #880 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 89 | #810 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 49 | #1,099 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 61 | #977 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 51 | #1,061 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 32 | #1,357 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 25 | #1,545 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 25 | #1,538 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 16 | #1,976 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 12 | #2,309 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 24 | #1,519 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 14 | #2,073 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 17 | #1,855 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 15 | #2,030 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 12 | #2,210 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 5 | #3,556 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 5 | #3,689 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 7 | #3,095 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 9 | #2,614 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 13 | #2,049 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 16 | #1,769 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 7 | #2,988 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 10 | #2,403 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 6 | #3,345 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 10 | #2,376 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 16 | #1,796 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 5 | #3,952 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 6 | #3,472 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 8 | #2,984 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 6 | #3,591 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 10 | #2,703 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 6 | #3,763 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 9 | #2,959 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 6 | #3,969 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 8 | #3,276 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 8 | #3,384 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 10 | #2,859 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 9 | #3,136 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 8 | #3,357 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 7 | #3,662 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 11 | #2,594 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 5 | #4,502 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 5 | #4,290 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 7 | #3,352 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 5 | #3,056 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Kerwin reached #810 in 1959. It has never been ranked as a girl name. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1950s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.