Is Wendall a boy or girl name?
Wendall was a boy name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 0.2% of the 2,431 US babies named Wendall were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #9,790
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Wendall since 1904
- 2,431
- Most popular year
- 1958
- 55 babies
Boys and girls named Wendall, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 5 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 98 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 289 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 267 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 234 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 374 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 425 | 6 | 1.4% |
| 1970s | 229 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 171 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 121 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 94 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 83 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 35 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8 | #9,790 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 7 | #10,744 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 5 | #14,207 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 5 | #13,958 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 10 | #8,014 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 7 | #10,746 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 11 | #7,585 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 12 | #7,071 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 10 | #8,115 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 10 | #8,000 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 11 | #7,523 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 17 | #5,387 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 5 | #14,125 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 11 | #7,664 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 10 | #8,287 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 10 | #8,139 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 9 | #8,682 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 6 | #11,406 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 9 | #8,118 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 8 | #8,602 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 8 | #8,413 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 11 | #6,428 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 12 | #5,900 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 5 | #11,547 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 5 | #11,260 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 13 | #4,946 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 13 | #4,867 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 13 | #4,781 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 19 | #3,588 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 17 | #3,812 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 8 | #6,661 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 11 | #5,087 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 17 | #3,599 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 16 | #3,612 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 18 | #3,073 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 23 | #2,465 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 12 | #3,873 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 25 | #2,224 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 15 | #3,101 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 15 | #3,067 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 14 | #3,276 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 16 | #2,894 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 17 | #2,828 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 15 | #3,016 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 12 | #3,394 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 19 | #2,454 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 24 | #2,053 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 20 | #2,283 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 19 | #2,275 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 25 | #1,817 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 36 | #1,440 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 30 | #1,631 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 29 | #1,613 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 32 | #1,435 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 32 | #1,391 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 49 | #1,059 | 6 | #6,786 |
| 1966 | 47 | #1,088 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 36 | #1,293 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 45 | #1,161 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 45 | #1,164 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 48 | #1,120 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 49 | #1,135 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 42 | #1,227 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 43 | #1,196 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 55 | #1,039 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 43 | #1,198 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 40 | #1,217 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 39 | #1,217 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 32 | #1,359 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 25 | #1,550 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 43 | #1,134 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 27 | #1,461 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 27 | #1,432 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 18 | #1,818 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 24 | #1,516 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 30 | #1,359 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 27 | #1,381 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 22 | #1,442 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 14 | #1,985 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 26 | #1,398 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 29 | #1,315 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 20 | #1,586 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 24 | #1,395 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 25 | #1,356 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 27 | #1,309 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 20 | #1,575 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 26 | #1,325 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 32 | #1,192 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 37 | #1,091 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 19 | #1,641 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 29 | #1,285 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 25 | #1,426 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 27 | #1,425 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 35 | #1,193 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 27 | #1,446 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 38 | #1,177 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 32 | #1,294 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 36 | #1,200 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 28 | #1,455 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 21 | #1,750 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 17 | #2,037 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 29 | #1,411 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 26 | #1,502 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 16 | #2,057 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 17 | #1,995 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 15 | #2,088 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 8 | #3,167 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 13 | #2,176 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 13 | #1,865 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 9 | #2,088 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 7 | #2,260 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 5 | #1,390 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Wendall reached #1,039 in 1958. As a girl name, it reached #6,786 in 1967. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1950s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Wendall
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.