Is Laurice a boy or girl name?
Laurice was mostly a girl name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 86.1% of the 2,019 US babies named Laurice were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Laurice since 1903
- 2,019
- Most popular year
- 1954
- 48 babies
Boys and girls named Laurice, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 5 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 36 | 84 | 70% |
| 1920s | 73 | 261 | 78.1% |
| 1930s | 45 | 192 | 81% |
| 1940s | 29 | 175 | 85.8% |
| 1950s | 11 | 289 | 96.3% |
| 1960s | 14 | 253 | 94.8% |
| 1970s | 33 | 222 | 87.1% |
| 1980s | 7 | 151 | 95.6% |
| 1990s | 10 | 94 | 90.4% |
| 2000s | 17 | 18 | 51.4% |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | – |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 6 | #11,958 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 6 | #11,478 | 5 | #18,820 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 6 | #15,233 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 5 | #11,746 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 7 | #12,840 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 6 | #13,026 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 11 | #7,888 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 9 | #9,194 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 10 | #8,505 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 12 | #7,289 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 16 | #5,885 |
| 1991 | 5 | #9,026 | 12 | #7,206 |
| 1990 | 5 | #8,939 | 18 | #5,182 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 12 | #6,773 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 18 | #4,761 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 10 | #7,096 |
| 1986 | 7 | #5,697 | 12 | #5,993 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 12 | #5,867 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 15 | #4,868 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 20 | #3,881 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,594 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 17 | #4,438 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 12 | #5,732 |
| 1979 | 6 | #5,773 | 13 | #5,267 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 22 | #3,446 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 14 | #4,798 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 12 | #5,058 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,042 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 18 | #3,632 |
| 1973 | 11 | #3,140 | 20 | #3,295 |
| 1972 | 5 | #5,423 | 39 | #2,039 |
| 1971 | 5 | #5,339 | 35 | #2,279 |
| 1970 | 6 | #4,520 | 33 | #2,334 |
| 1969 | 7 | #3,788 | 27 | #2,551 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 25 | #2,514 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 28 | #2,297 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 17 | #3,106 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 26 | #2,375 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 24 | #2,564 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 24 | #2,516 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 27 | #2,340 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 27 | #2,331 |
| 1960 | 7 | #3,518 | 28 | #2,223 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 27 | #2,218 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 26 | #2,233 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 21 | #2,523 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,676 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,784 |
| 1954 | 5 | #4,127 | 43 | #1,549 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,541 |
| 1952 | 6 | #3,574 | 31 | #1,803 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,757 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,640 |
| 1949 | 5 | #3,993 | 28 | #1,827 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,380 |
| 1947 | 7 | #3,242 | 18 | #2,403 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,275 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,534 |
| 1944 | 7 | #3,000 | 17 | #2,157 |
| 1943 | 5 | #3,818 | 18 | #2,115 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,012 |
| 1941 | 5 | #3,787 | 17 | #2,061 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,249 |
| 1939 | 6 | #3,308 | 13 | #2,358 |
| 1938 | 8 | #2,771 | 14 | #2,284 |
| 1937 | 5 | #3,810 | 20 | #1,755 |
| 1936 | 5 | #3,837 | 19 | #1,773 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,745 |
| 1934 | 6 | #3,504 | 14 | #2,239 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,636 |
| 1932 | 5 | #4,062 | 29 | #1,409 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,367 |
| 1930 | 10 | #2,705 | 28 | #1,487 |
| 1929 | 7 | #3,413 | 16 | #2,137 |
| 1928 | 12 | #2,463 | 24 | #1,710 |
| 1927 | 10 | #2,817 | 31 | #1,471 |
| 1926 | 5 | #4,539 | 35 | #1,344 |
| 1925 | 6 | #3,981 | 29 | #1,555 |
| 1924 | 5 | #4,700 | 24 | #1,787 |
| 1923 | 5 | #4,581 | 33 | #1,414 |
| 1922 | 6 | #4,100 | 31 | #1,486 |
| 1921 | 10 | #2,901 | 23 | #1,837 |
| 1920 | 7 | #3,670 | 15 | #2,412 |
| 1919 | 14 | #2,205 | 22 | #1,781 |
| 1918 | 5 | #4,512 | 10 | #3,139 |
| 1917 | 6 | #3,780 | 19 | #1,876 |
| 1916 | 6 | #3,708 | 12 | #2,576 |
| 1915 | 5 | #4,132 | 9 | #3,011 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,067 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 5 | #1,223 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Laurice reached #1,223 in 1903. As a girl name, it reached #1,344 in 1926. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1950s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Laurice
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.