Is Reda a boy or girl name?
Reda is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 12 boys were named Reda, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 83.7% of the 2,201 US babies named Reda were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #7,141
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Reda since 1904
- 2,201
- Most popular year
- 1955
- 67 babies
Boys and girls named Reda, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 27 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 135 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 268 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 283 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 338 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 483 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 200 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 53 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 31 | 100% |
| 1990s | 23 | 6 | 20.7% |
| 2000s | 103 | 13 | 11.2% |
| 2010s | 175 | 6 | 3.3% |
| 2020s | 57 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 12 | #7,141 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 6 | #11,932 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 15 | #6,079 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 11 | #7,465 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 13 | #6,545 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 14 | #6,332 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 17 | #5,490 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 22 | #4,562 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 15 | #5,986 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 15 | #5,928 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 17 | #5,431 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 18 | #5,124 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 20 | #4,817 | 6 | #16,430 |
| 2011 | 20 | #4,785 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 17 | #5,422 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 18 | #5,264 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 23 | #4,362 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 9 | #8,762 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 9 | #8,581 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 11 | #7,008 | 8 | #12,754 |
| 2004 | 5 | #12,805 | 5 | #18,187 |
| 2003 | 7 | #9,392 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 9 | #7,493 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 6 | #10,267 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 6 | #10,053 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 6 | #9,625 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 5 | #10,941 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 6 | #9,014 | 6 | #13,347 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 6 | #8,460 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 5 | #12,739 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 5 | #11,697 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 5 | #11,561 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 9 | #7,325 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 7 | #8,821 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 7 | #8,189 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 10 | #5,926 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 6 | #8,750 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 8 | #6,709 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 15 | #4,039 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 7 | #6,868 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,966 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 15 | #3,571 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 13 | #3,793 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 16 | #3,235 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 21 | #2,730 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,649 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,841 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,894 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,593 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,808 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 29 | #2,142 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,623 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 51 | #1,505 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,448 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 67 | #1,242 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 57 | #1,331 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,485 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,438 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,478 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 50 | #1,299 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,731 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,470 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,352 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,355 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,509 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,598 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,653 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,465 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,441 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,338 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,537 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,178 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,326 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,288 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,348 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 19 | #1,823 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,355 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,481 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,494 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,599 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,550 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,953 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,189 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,504 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,102 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,559 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,299 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,947 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,910 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,002 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,909 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,442 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,187 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 19 | #1,857 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,124 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 13 | #1,996 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 9 | #2,300 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 8 | #2,317 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,793 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,367 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,529 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,514 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,823 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Reda reached #4,362 in 2008. As a girl name, it reached #1,178 in 1938. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1950s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.