Is Pamelia a boy or girl name?
Pamelia was a girl name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 2,229 US babies named Pamelia were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Pamelia since 1897
- 2,229
- Most popular year
- 1954
- 103 babies
Boys and girls named Pamelia, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 5 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1910s | 0 | 31 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 74 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 121 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 448 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 844 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 539 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 147 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 20 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | – |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 5 | #11,940 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 8 | #7,938 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 7 | #8,763 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 6 | #9,833 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 8 | #7,437 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 6 | #9,290 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 13 | #4,821 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 8 | #6,947 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 8 | #6,685 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 19 | #3,434 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 14 | #4,236 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 29 | #2,579 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 36 | #2,226 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 29 | #2,437 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 29 | #2,277 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 35 | #2,000 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,973 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,524 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 58 | #1,491 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 68 | #1,348 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 71 | #1,320 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 82 | #1,221 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 78 | #1,246 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 88 | #1,140 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 86 | #1,149 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 77 | #1,208 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 73 | #1,226 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 90 | #1,068 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 103 | #954 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 90 | #1,017 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 83 | #1,035 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 79 | #1,048 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 75 | #1,069 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 90 | #940 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 72 | #1,047 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,223 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,161 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,171 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,306 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,581 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,583 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,169 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 19 | #1,883 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,281 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,419 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,167 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 17 | #1,932 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,696 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,184 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 17 | #1,955 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,223 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,930 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,267 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,697 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,914 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,688 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,218 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,600 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,921 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,934 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,608 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,881 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,397 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,473 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,807 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,397 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 5 | #3,591 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,736 |
Highest rank
Pamelia has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #940 in 1949. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1950s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Pamelia
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.