Is Libbie a boy or girl name?
Libbie was a girl name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 2,506 US babies named Libbie were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #12,859
- Babies named Libbie since 1880
- 2,506
- Most popular year
- 1915
- 49 babies
Boys and girls named Libbie, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 204 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 228 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 196 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 362 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 231 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 105 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 129 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 161 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 140 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 79 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 56 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 111 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 278 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 179 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 47 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 7 | #12,859 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 5 | #16,578 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,307 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 11 | #9,293 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 11 | #9,277 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,208 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 8 | #12,044 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,671 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,678 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,610 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,910 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 24 | #5,586 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 26 | #5,343 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 22 | #6,053 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 21 | #6,304 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 31 | #4,758 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 26 | #5,518 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 32 | #4,622 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 26 | #5,316 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 40 | #3,693 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 31 | #4,444 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 30 | #4,371 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 20 | #5,798 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 26 | #4,634 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 16 | #6,676 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 12 | #8,013 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 18 | #5,712 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 19 | #5,326 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 14 | #6,587 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 11 | #7,843 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 13 | #6,912 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 12 | #7,299 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 6 | #12,657 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 6 | #12,246 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 9 | #8,443 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 5 | #12,982 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 5 | #12,391 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 8 | #8,161 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 6 | #10,049 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 5 | #11,392 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 7 | #8,581 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 5 | #11,350 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 6 | #9,770 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 5 | #10,677 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 14 | #4,804 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 9 | #6,349 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 11 | #5,349 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 8 | #6,581 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 9 | #5,827 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 8 | #6,286 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 7 | #7,016 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 8 | #6,096 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 11 | #4,599 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 21 | #2,828 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 17 | #3,152 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 8 | #5,087 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,367 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,968 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,733 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 15 | #3,365 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,797 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,326 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,932 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,652 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,784 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,355 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,484 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,098 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,588 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,465 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,352 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,615 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,796 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,773 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,250 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,440 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,278 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,861 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,375 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,109 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,147 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,869 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,262 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,692 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,852 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,844 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,141 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 17 | #1,939 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,191 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,895 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,214 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 19 | #1,923 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,756 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,303 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,963 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,244 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,842 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,061 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,552 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,457 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,391 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,287 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,317 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,022 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,035 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 49 | #951 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,052 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 46 | #778 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 31 | #912 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 20 | #999 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 20 | #989 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 22 | #882 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 17 | #990 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,462 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 31 | #656 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 29 | #660 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 19 | #844 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 13 | #1,005 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 19 | #808 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 14 | #904 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 23 | #771 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 20 | #717 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 18 | #803 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 28 | #577 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 23 | #662 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 22 | #673 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 21 | #655 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 29 | #517 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 27 | #533 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 16 | #683 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 24 | #544 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 24 | #524 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 30 | #452 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 21 | #494 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 22 | #472 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 18 | #514 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 20 | #459 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 15 | #506 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 15 | #484 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 20 | #379 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 19 | #379 |
Highest rank
Libbie has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #379 in 1880. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Libbie
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.