Is Livia a boy or girl name?
Livia is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 321 girls and 0 boys were named Livia, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 9,903 US babies named Livia were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #836
- Babies named Livia since 1906
- 9,903
- Most popular year
- 2018
- 430 babies
Boys and girls named Livia, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 20 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 135 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 192 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 99 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 118 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 276 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 248 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 266 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 251 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 510 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 2,291 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 3,830 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 1,667 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 321 | #836 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 334 | #826 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 312 | #893 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 366 | #776 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 334 | #816 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 368 | #762 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 430 | #680 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 386 | #734 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 400 | #712 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 393 | #724 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 428 | #667 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 362 | #748 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 374 | #744 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 365 | #756 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 324 | #831 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 322 | #865 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 288 | #944 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 250 | #1,050 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 229 | #1,100 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 266 | #932 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 254 | #950 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 230 | #1,005 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 191 | #1,106 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 135 | #1,409 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 126 | #1,464 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 107 | #1,578 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 92 | #1,726 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 62 | #2,215 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 40 | #2,996 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 44 | #2,761 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 44 | #2,780 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 39 | #3,020 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 30 | #3,634 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 32 | #3,408 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 20 | #4,794 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 28 | #3,624 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 22 | #4,104 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 19 | #4,399 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 20 | #4,126 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,761 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 29 | #3,026 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 18 | #4,204 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 36 | #2,620 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 34 | #2,696 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 29 | #3,038 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 33 | #2,702 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 37 | #2,408 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 35 | #2,492 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 33 | #2,461 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,114 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 25 | #2,883 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 25 | #2,795 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 17 | #3,643 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 19 | #3,442 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 19 | #3,374 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 22 | #2,882 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 27 | #2,394 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 13 | #3,764 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 29 | #2,227 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,579 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 30 | #2,228 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 18 | #3,025 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 25 | #2,443 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 31 | #2,132 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 30 | #2,130 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 31 | #2,040 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,692 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,716 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,952 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,510 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 28 | #2,005 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,994 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 22 | #2,241 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,354 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,498 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,296 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,777 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,251 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,370 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,683 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,552 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,641 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,157 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,215 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,502 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,509 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,118 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,614 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,660 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,092 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,791 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 18 | #1,921 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,676 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,375 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,981 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,569 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,974 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,805 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,080 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,844 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,994 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,929 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,748 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,128 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,032 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,159 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 18 | #1,965 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,509 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,011 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 19 | #1,515 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 7 | #2,684 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,919 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,688 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 6 | #2,104 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,736 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,648 |
Highest rank
Livia has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #667 in 2014. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2010s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Livia
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.