Is Zora a boy or girl name?
Zora is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 289 girls and 0 boys were named Zora, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.6% of the 9,972 US babies named Zora were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #918
- Babies named Zora since 1880
- 9,972
- Most popular year
- 2019
- 353 babies
Boys and girls named Zora, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 415 | 100% |
| 1890s | 5 | 626 | 99.2% |
| 1900s | 0 | 679 | 100% |
| 1910s | 11 | 1,155 | 99.1% |
| 1920s | 0 | 1,103 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 651 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 435 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 290 | 100% |
| 1960s | 5 | 132 | 96.4% |
| 1970s | 0 | 93 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 63 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 176 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 877 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 1,662 | 100% |
| 2020s | 16 | 1,578 | 99% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 289 | #918 |
| 2023 | 6 | #12,224 | 311 | #860 |
| 2022 | 10 | #8,290 | 332 | #847 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 338 | #823 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 308 | #875 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 353 | #788 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 270 | #979 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 206 | #1,189 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 164 | #1,419 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 140 | #1,575 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 139 | #1,568 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 99 | #1,989 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 109 | #1,857 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 94 | #2,072 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 88 | #2,219 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 87 | #2,269 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 112 | #1,901 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 104 | #1,987 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 98 | #2,030 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 98 | #1,968 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 102 | #1,870 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 117 | #1,651 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 62 | #2,553 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 65 | #2,437 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 32 | #3,981 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 26 | #4,444 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 20 | #5,361 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 25 | #4,368 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 16 | #6,063 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 24 | #4,348 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 15 | #6,318 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 16 | #5,953 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 14 | #6,651 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 12 | #7,429 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 8 | #10,192 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 10 | #8,036 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 7 | #9,822 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 9 | #7,748 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 7 | #9,304 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 10 | #6,888 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 7 | #9,108 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 13 | #5,542 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 9 | #7,313 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 8 | #7,649 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 9 | #6,891 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 7 | #8,155 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 11 | #5,514 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 14 | #4,457 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 9 | #6,078 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 12 | #4,791 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 14 | #4,309 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 10 | #5,056 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 11 | #4,489 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 15 | #3,483 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 7 | #5,807 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 15 | #3,400 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 7 | #6,007 |
| 1963 | 5 | #4,620 | 14 | #3,634 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 14 | #3,593 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,837 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,903 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 11 | #4,030 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,755 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 30 | #2,026 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 24 | #2,320 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,838 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 24 | #2,238 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,438 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,679 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,636 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,719 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,602 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,326 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,601 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,438 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,260 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 51 | #1,103 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,211 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,299 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 52 | #1,019 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,034 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 55 | #959 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 61 | #913 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,017 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 59 | #893 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 62 | #883 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 72 | #793 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 57 | #903 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 70 | #825 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 73 | #796 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 93 | #731 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 72 | #841 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 81 | #799 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 92 | #756 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 93 | #747 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 114 | #692 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 122 | #675 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 130 | #648 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 128 | #650 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 136 | #635 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 135 | #616 |
| 1919 | 6 | #4,167 | 117 | #644 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 134 | #611 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 135 | #590 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 152 | #540 |
| 1915 | 5 | #4,389 | 169 | #475 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 120 | #510 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 90 | #537 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 99 | #482 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 82 | #455 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 57 | #542 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 57 | #499 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 59 | #473 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 92 | #368 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 64 | #434 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 55 | #457 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 54 | #444 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 83 | #350 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 58 | #407 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 58 | #388 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 99 | #338 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 56 | #388 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 65 | #388 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 67 | #361 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 72 | #346 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 55 | #377 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 66 | #342 |
| 1893 | 5 | #1,179 | 67 | #331 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 66 | #329 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 52 | #348 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 60 | #328 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 53 | #345 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 42 | #373 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 46 | #318 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 52 | #288 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 48 | #293 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 58 | #258 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 35 | #299 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 32 | #316 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 21 | #373 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 28 | #304 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Zora reached #1,179 in 1893. As a girl name, it reached #258 in 1884. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2010s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Zora
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.