Is Lucretia a boy or girl name?
Lucretia was a girl name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 10,422 US babies named Lucretia were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Lucretia since 1880
- 10,422
- Most popular year
- 1974
- 190 babies
Boys and girls named Lucretia, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 365 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 302 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 319 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 657 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 902 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 841 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 1,288 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 1,311 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 1,552 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 1,568 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 842 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 365 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 70 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 40 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | – |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 7 | #13,272 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 6 | #15,206 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 5 | #17,805 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 8 | #12,935 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 6 | #15,991 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 8 | #12,985 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 6 | #16,430 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 6 | #16,659 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 9 | #12,255 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 5 | #18,896 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 6 | #15,293 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 6 | #14,991 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 12 | #8,611 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 7 | #12,891 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 13 | #7,841 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 13 | #7,508 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 21 | #5,057 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 22 | #4,755 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 20 | #4,978 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 25 | #4,171 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 35 | #3,277 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 41 | #2,916 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 53 | #2,445 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 65 | #2,085 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 70 | #1,965 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 68 | #1,919 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 72 | #1,762 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 66 | #1,784 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 76 | #1,581 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 73 | #1,627 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 67 | #1,649 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 85 | #1,397 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 117 | #1,174 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 114 | #1,168 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 104 | #1,256 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 110 | #1,194 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 125 | #1,064 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 142 | #975 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 144 | #912 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 145 | #904 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 190 | #747 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 173 | #777 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 173 | #794 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 189 | #770 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 177 | #792 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 136 | #909 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 133 | #895 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 114 | #955 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 161 | #775 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 150 | #812 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 172 | #794 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 161 | #822 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 168 | #808 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 178 | #787 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 179 | #763 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 133 | #906 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 121 | #939 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 129 | #899 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 143 | #828 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 141 | #817 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 143 | #784 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 136 | #790 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 110 | #880 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 121 | #813 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 134 | #744 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 113 | #828 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 125 | #765 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 118 | #807 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 126 | #720 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 96 | #765 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 119 | #688 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 128 | #670 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 152 | #603 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 165 | #548 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 146 | #579 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 108 | #653 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 88 | #733 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 88 | #721 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 92 | #697 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 81 | #755 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 66 | #843 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 71 | #786 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 104 | #662 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 75 | #781 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 68 | #876 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 72 | #838 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 87 | #771 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 105 | #707 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 107 | #700 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 79 | #838 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 92 | #780 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 75 | #849 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 87 | #781 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 97 | #746 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 101 | #723 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 76 | #809 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 92 | #746 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 78 | #786 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 89 | #724 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 92 | #690 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 61 | #740 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 49 | #756 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 51 | #708 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 40 | #692 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 29 | #807 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 37 | #656 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 35 | #660 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 30 | #697 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 30 | #672 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 36 | #583 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 33 | #594 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 32 | #585 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 28 | #634 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 30 | #570 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 28 | #682 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 29 | #575 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 26 | #645 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 30 | #548 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 31 | #543 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 29 | #557 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 31 | #521 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 27 | #542 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 32 | #485 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 35 | #426 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 32 | #463 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 30 | #447 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 35 | #424 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 27 | #430 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 32 | #382 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 34 | #346 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 26 | #394 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 35 | #297 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 65 | #207 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 52 | #211 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 29 | #292 |
Highest rank
Lucretia has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #207 in 1882. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1970s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Lucretia
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.