Is Rodrick a boy or girl name?
Rodrick is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 32 boys were named Rodrick, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.1% of the 8,943 US babies named Rodrick were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #3,573
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Rodrick since 1914
- 8,943
- Most popular year
- 1977
- 273 babies
Boys and girls named Rodrick, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 10 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 31 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 105 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 243 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 615 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 1,248 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 2,211 | 5 | 0.2% |
| 1980s | 1,716 | 0 | 0% |
| 1990s | 1,246 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 750 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 582 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 181 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 32 | #3,573 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 33 | #3,539 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 37 | #3,265 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 31 | #3,632 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 48 | #2,650 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 33 | #3,480 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 56 | #2,379 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 44 | #2,788 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 46 | #2,681 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 52 | #2,451 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 51 | #2,485 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 78 | #1,847 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 70 | #2,013 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 72 | #1,944 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 80 | #1,827 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 66 | #2,092 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 71 | #1,998 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 62 | #2,181 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 71 | #1,916 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 78 | #1,720 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 66 | #1,875 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 88 | #1,490 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 90 | #1,441 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 79 | #1,538 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 79 | #1,536 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 89 | #1,352 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 90 | #1,335 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 103 | #1,175 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 126 | #996 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 105 | #1,119 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 138 | #940 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 134 | #932 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 144 | #881 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 166 | #802 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 151 | #839 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 180 | #739 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 165 | #737 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 134 | #806 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 145 | #753 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 156 | #708 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 185 | #629 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 166 | #666 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 198 | #614 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 172 | #654 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 215 | #588 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 216 | #583 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 240 | #536 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 273 | #492 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 220 | #541 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 239 | #521 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 231 | #521 | 5 | #9,845 |
| 1973 | 201 | #560 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 188 | #582 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 194 | #596 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 209 | #561 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 161 | #618 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 150 | #618 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 129 | #658 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 121 | #677 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 157 | #613 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 128 | #683 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 121 | #709 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 117 | #713 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 80 | #856 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 84 | #832 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 74 | #894 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 65 | #947 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 71 | #907 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 66 | #923 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 75 | #853 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 55 | #1,017 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 56 | #963 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 60 | #924 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 54 | #958 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 39 | #1,164 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 33 | #1,271 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 42 | #1,104 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 33 | #1,289 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 36 | #1,173 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 25 | #1,342 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 17 | #1,723 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 17 | #1,819 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 14 | #2,029 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 17 | #1,743 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 9 | #2,642 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 15 | #1,857 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 19 | #1,605 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 12 | #2,178 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 11 | #2,277 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 5 | #4,059 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 12 | #2,233 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 7 | #3,228 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 9 | #2,806 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 9 | #2,839 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 6 | #3,927 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 6 | #4,066 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 6 | #4,123 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 7 | #3,677 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 6 | #4,260 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 6 | #4,164 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 5 | #4,688 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 5 | #3,663 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Rodrick reached #492 in 1977. As a girl name, it reached #9,845 in 1974. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1970s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Rodrick
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.