Is Roderick a boy or girl name?
Roderick is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 83 boys were named Roderick, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.6% of the 47,351 US babies named Roderick were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #1,909
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Roderick since 1880
- 47,351
- Most popular year
- 1971
- 1,067 babies
Boys and girls named Roderick, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 60 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 82 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 102 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 644 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 1,478 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 1,684 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 2,663 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 6,293 | 11 | 0.2% |
| 1960s | 9,637 | 67 | 0.7% |
| 1970s | 8,598 | 101 | 1.2% |
| 1980s | 6,625 | 84 | 1.3% |
| 1990s | 4,313 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 2,650 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 1,795 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 464 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 83 | #1,909 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 82 | #1,923 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 103 | #1,674 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 96 | #1,706 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 100 | #1,618 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 134 | #1,344 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 131 | #1,358 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 160 | #1,173 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 199 | #1,017 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 185 | #1,070 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 178 | #1,087 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 178 | #1,059 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 204 | #982 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 220 | #917 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 206 | #964 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 229 | #904 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 217 | #939 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 255 | #838 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 292 | #733 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 249 | #783 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 265 | #721 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 240 | #749 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 305 | #639 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 288 | #650 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 310 | #615 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 331 | #588 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 290 | #628 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 356 | #550 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 361 | #535 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 399 | #512 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 437 | #486 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 489 | #447 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 511 | #432 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 540 | #418 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 599 | #387 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 610 | #367 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 568 | #361 | 6 | #11,408 |
| 1987 | 597 | #338 | 8 | #8,564 |
| 1986 | 631 | #322 | 9 | #7,590 |
| 1985 | 668 | #308 | 7 | #9,047 |
| 1984 | 629 | #311 | 9 | #7,270 |
| 1983 | 682 | #294 | 10 | #6,589 |
| 1982 | 740 | #279 | 11 | #6,254 |
| 1981 | 742 | #279 | 14 | #5,179 |
| 1980 | 758 | #278 | 10 | #6,656 |
| 1979 | 746 | #275 | 10 | #6,573 |
| 1978 | 691 | #280 | 13 | #5,139 |
| 1977 | 760 | #260 | 6 | #9,346 |
| 1976 | 783 | #253 | 14 | #4,535 |
| 1975 | 796 | #252 | 11 | #5,420 |
| 1974 | 880 | #235 | 12 | #4,946 |
| 1973 | 908 | #231 | 8 | #6,518 |
| 1972 | 940 | #229 | 9 | #5,816 |
| 1971 | 1,057 | #223 | 10 | #5,432 |
| 1970 | 1,037 | #228 | 8 | #6,235 |
| 1969 | 980 | #234 | 9 | #5,357 |
| 1968 | 998 | #227 | 9 | #5,062 |
| 1967 | 1,008 | #221 | 11 | #4,240 |
| 1966 | 961 | #226 | 7 | #5,686 |
| 1965 | 997 | #231 | 8 | #5,191 |
| 1964 | 1,027 | #234 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 990 | #243 | 7 | #5,762 |
| 1962 | 932 | #253 | 11 | #4,217 |
| 1961 | 900 | #260 | 5 | #7,323 |
| 1960 | 844 | #276 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 809 | #279 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 699 | #289 | 5 | #6,822 |
| 1957 | 766 | #274 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 682 | #282 | 6 | #5,819 |
| 1955 | 646 | #282 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 572 | #299 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 632 | #277 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 546 | #304 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 466 | #320 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 475 | #314 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 401 | #336 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 364 | #351 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 368 | #356 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 302 | #375 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 248 | #379 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 234 | #398 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 222 | #415 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 202 | #434 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 160 | #472 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 162 | #457 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 189 | #414 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 191 | #410 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 188 | #416 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 180 | #411 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 151 | #462 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 170 | #432 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 166 | #428 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 140 | #486 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 156 | #451 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 153 | #482 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 177 | #448 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 182 | #443 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 178 | #459 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 174 | #458 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 148 | #501 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 140 | #533 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 131 | #534 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 137 | #536 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 106 | #619 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 105 | #617 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 76 | #737 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 90 | #650 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 96 | #609 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 82 | #648 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 84 | #636 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 65 | #631 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 74 | #506 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 46 | #606 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 17 | #817 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 14 | #854 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 11 | #944 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 13 | #772 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 9 | #988 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 12 | #745 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 5 | #1,389 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 9 | #864 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 14 | #613 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 8 | #916 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 8 | #842 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 13 | #724 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 6 | #1,034 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 12 | #656 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 9 | #776 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 9 | #816 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 10 | #715 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 6 | #1,008 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 7 | #937 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 15 | #470 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 8 | #800 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 9 | #714 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 7 | #899 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 13 | #511 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 5 | #1,080 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 8 | #752 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 5 | #1,095 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 6 | #927 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 7 | #795 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Roderick reached #221 in 1967. As a girl name, it reached #4,217 in 1962. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1970s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Roderick
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.