Is Mabel a boy or girl name?
Mabel is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 1,380 girls and 0 boys were named Mabel, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.7% of the 141,163 US babies named Mabel were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #222
- Babies named Mabel since 1880
- 141,163
- Most popular year
- 1915
- 3,696 babies
Boys and girls named Mabel, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 31 | 13,096 | 99.8% |
| 1890s | 55 | 21,991 | 99.8% |
| 1900s | 103 | 21,625 | 99.5% |
| 1910s | 107 | 30,783 | 99.7% |
| 1920s | 69 | 24,522 | 99.7% |
| 1930s | 39 | 8,798 | 99.6% |
| 1940s | 5 | 4,020 | 99.9% |
| 1950s | 0 | 1,836 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 1,053 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 690 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 779 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 694 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 1,073 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 4,710 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 5,084 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 1,380 | #222 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 1,130 | #278 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 1,026 | #310 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 831 | #375 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 717 | #428 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 712 | #440 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 727 | #438 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 703 | #452 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 605 | #515 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 529 | #578 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 427 | #669 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 393 | #711 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 241 | #1,046 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 196 | #1,227 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 177 | #1,332 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 147 | #1,542 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 139 | #1,632 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 127 | #1,718 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 116 | #1,791 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 106 | #1,846 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 90 | #2,034 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 97 | #1,891 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 93 | #1,907 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 83 | #2,044 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 75 | #2,152 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 90 | #1,779 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 77 | #1,969 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 42 | #2,911 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 58 | #2,299 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 53 | #2,442 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 76 | #1,881 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 65 | #2,105 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 80 | #1,812 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 75 | #1,888 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 78 | #1,839 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 64 | #1,990 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 105 | #1,364 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 86 | #1,506 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 72 | #1,648 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 67 | #1,722 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 75 | #1,523 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 73 | #1,547 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 75 | #1,577 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 86 | #1,428 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 76 | #1,549 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 70 | #1,616 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 62 | #1,698 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 64 | #1,647 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 76 | #1,402 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 68 | #1,506 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 82 | #1,308 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 65 | #1,471 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 68 | #1,438 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 75 | #1,413 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 60 | #1,590 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 86 | #1,203 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 71 | #1,320 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 72 | #1,277 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 84 | #1,168 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 94 | #1,083 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 124 | #947 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 122 | #960 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 126 | #948 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 140 | #914 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 134 | #916 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 140 | #877 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 132 | #890 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 175 | #755 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 181 | #716 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 194 | #672 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 173 | #707 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 197 | #636 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 216 | #593 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 200 | #608 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 228 | #549 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 253 | #514 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 311 | #453 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 345 | #443 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 334 | #421 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 344 | #379 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 387 | #351 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 478 | #319 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 513 | #304 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 507 | #285 |
| 1940 | 5 | #3,763 | 548 | #265 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 593 | #256 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 674 | #245 |
| 1937 | 5 | #3,841 | 697 | #233 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 743 | #222 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 826 | #208 |
| 1934 | 6 | #3,536 | 850 | #209 |
| 1933 | 7 | #3,176 | 875 | #196 |
| 1932 | 6 | #3,619 | 1,111 | #171 |
| 1931 | 6 | #3,620 | 1,060 | #174 |
| 1930 | 9 | #2,923 | 1,369 | #150 |
| 1929 | 9 | #2,882 | 1,516 | #147 |
| 1928 | 7 | #3,579 | 1,742 | #135 |
| 1927 | 5 | #4,566 | 1,954 | #133 |
| 1926 | 8 | #3,290 | 2,076 | #127 |
| 1925 | 8 | #3,298 | 2,292 | #118 |
| 1924 | 5 | #4,726 | 2,652 | #108 |
| 1923 | 7 | #3,682 | 2,696 | #102 |
| 1922 | 6 | #4,129 | 2,894 | #99 |
| 1921 | 5 | #4,727 | 3,336 | #85 |
| 1920 | 9 | #3,111 | 3,364 | #83 |
| 1919 | 7 | #3,616 | 3,405 | #78 |
| 1918 | 9 | #3,014 | 3,636 | #74 |
| 1917 | 17 | #1,874 | 3,499 | #68 |
| 1916 | 6 | #3,734 | 3,680 | #65 |
| 1915 | 13 | #2,132 | 3,683 | #62 |
| 1914 | 12 | #1,925 | 3,131 | #58 |
| 1913 | 8 | #2,194 | 2,741 | #56 |
| 1912 | 15 | #1,250 | 2,714 | #46 |
| 1911 | 10 | #1,170 | 2,171 | #43 |
| 1910 | 10 | #1,091 | 2,123 | #46 |
| 1909 | 11 | #933 | 2,007 | #41 |
| 1908 | 12 | #808 | 2,096 | #37 |
| 1907 | 11 | #845 | 2,069 | #36 |
| 1906 | 10 | #832 | 2,054 | #34 |
| 1905 | 7 | #1,048 | 2,178 | #29 |
| 1904 | 12 | #710 | 2,172 | #27 |
| 1903 | 8 | #886 | 2,163 | #25 |
| 1902 | 12 | #673 | 2,280 | #24 |
| 1901 | 12 | #625 | 2,097 | #24 |
| 1900 | 8 | #1,014 | 2,509 | #25 |
| 1899 | 6 | #1,004 | 2,127 | #22 |
| 1898 | 7 | #953 | 2,331 | #23 |
| 1897 | 10 | #707 | 2,222 | #22 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 2,283 | #21 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 2,359 | #20 |
| 1894 | 6 | #1,033 | 2,221 | #20 |
| 1893 | 10 | #686 | 2,191 | #21 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 2,170 | #19 |
| 1891 | 8 | #744 | 2,029 | #15 |
| 1890 | 8 | #790 | 2,058 | #17 |
| 1889 | 7 | #856 | 1,947 | #16 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 1,830 | #17 |
| 1887 | 5 | #1,006 | 1,494 | #18 |
| 1886 | 6 | #922 | 1,422 | #20 |
| 1885 | 7 | #812 | 1,349 | #20 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 1,270 | #20 |
| 1883 | 6 | #852 | 1,086 | #23 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 997 | #23 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 893 | #23 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 808 | #22 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Mabel reached #625 in 1901. As a girl name, it reached #15 in 1891. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1910s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Mabel
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.