Is Maribel a boy or girl name?
Maribel is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 119 girls and 0 boys were named Maribel, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.3% of the 24,927 US babies named Maribel were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #1,706
- Babies named Maribel since 1906
- 24,927
- Most popular year
- 1980
- 777 babies
Boys and girls named Maribel, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 10 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 89 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 157 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 79 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 54 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 215 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 2,436 | 100% |
| 1970s | 46 | 5,343 | 99.1% |
| 1980s | 91 | 5,542 | 98.4% |
| 1990s | 48 | 5,197 | 99.1% |
| 2000s | 0 | 3,378 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 1,590 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 652 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 119 | #1,706 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 142 | #1,514 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 168 | #1,376 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 95 | #2,038 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 128 | #1,627 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 94 | #2,041 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 112 | #1,825 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 130 | #1,661 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 156 | #1,476 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 164 | #1,413 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 155 | #1,457 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 174 | #1,342 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 184 | #1,293 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 215 | #1,141 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 206 | #1,183 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 282 | #946 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 291 | #936 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 304 | #905 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 341 | #805 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 474 | #599 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 341 | #765 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 291 | #842 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 334 | #730 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 335 | #727 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 385 | #649 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 382 | #623 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 424 | #577 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 502 | #491 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 477 | #502 |
| 1995 | 6 | #8,481 | 513 | #484 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 501 | #496 |
| 1993 | 10 | #5,638 | 526 | #478 |
| 1992 | 10 | #5,504 | 610 | #415 |
| 1991 | 12 | #4,655 | 601 | #425 |
| 1990 | 10 | #5,246 | 661 | #394 |
| 1989 | 9 | #5,437 | 572 | #431 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 481 | #471 |
| 1987 | 6 | #6,645 | 491 | #450 |
| 1986 | 9 | #4,707 | 485 | #445 |
| 1985 | 11 | #3,948 | 460 | #463 |
| 1984 | 16 | #2,898 | 474 | #439 |
| 1983 | 13 | #3,351 | 510 | #424 |
| 1982 | 11 | #3,847 | 640 | #362 |
| 1981 | 7 | #5,275 | 661 | #355 |
| 1980 | 9 | #4,371 | 768 | #316 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 538 | #402 |
| 1978 | 5 | #6,416 | 515 | #399 |
| 1977 | 5 | #6,465 | 512 | #405 |
| 1976 | 7 | #4,738 | 528 | #389 |
| 1975 | 5 | #5,990 | 546 | #380 |
| 1974 | 6 | #5,015 | 558 | #380 |
| 1973 | 7 | #4,345 | 523 | #390 |
| 1972 | 6 | #4,765 | 555 | #385 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 576 | #390 |
| 1970 | 5 | #5,179 | 492 | #447 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 425 | #468 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 342 | #521 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 281 | #565 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 205 | #682 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 231 | #646 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 259 | #636 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 238 | #656 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 232 | #672 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 133 | #933 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 90 | #1,150 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 71 | #1,275 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,806 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 29 | #2,051 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 29 | #2,032 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 25 | #2,200 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,622 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 6 | #5,433 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,662 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,739 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,778 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,914 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,359 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,616 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,828 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,887 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,319 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,861 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,470 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,073 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,035 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,193 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,521 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,989 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,677 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,256 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,500 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,819 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,348 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,276 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,710 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,444 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,343 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,536 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,458 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,257 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,688 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,445 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,641 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 8 | #2,466 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,648 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,268 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,123 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Maribel reached #2,898 in 1984. As a girl name, it reached #316 in 1980. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1980s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Maribel
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.