Is Magnolia a boy or girl name?
Magnolia is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 2,146 girls and 0 boys were named Magnolia, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 21,154 US babies named Magnolia were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #138
- Babies named Magnolia since 1880
- 21,154
- Most popular year
- 2024
- 2,146 babies
Boys and girls named Magnolia, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 105 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 207 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 479 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 1,101 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 1,181 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 671 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 499 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 303 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 153 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 149 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 131 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 271 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 909 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 5,427 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 9,568 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 2,146 | #138 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 1,951 | #144 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 1,884 | #151 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 1,965 | #140 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 1,622 | #176 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 1,322 | #237 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 1,048 | #314 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 815 | #384 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 618 | #507 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 450 | #635 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 336 | #826 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 259 | #972 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 221 | #1,123 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 192 | #1,247 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 166 | #1,390 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 141 | #1,600 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 141 | #1,613 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 116 | #1,835 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 100 | #1,998 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 74 | #2,396 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 66 | #2,543 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 58 | #2,728 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 66 | #2,436 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 75 | #2,181 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 72 | #2,203 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 33 | #3,685 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 38 | #3,268 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 30 | #3,772 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 34 | #3,401 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 25 | #4,172 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 29 | #3,750 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 28 | #3,839 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 19 | #5,181 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 20 | #4,923 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 15 | #6,007 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 15 | #5,718 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 10 | #7,469 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 18 | #4,462 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 7 | #8,881 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,639 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 12 | #5,666 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 22 | #3,715 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 14 | #5,128 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 17 | #4,437 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 14 | #4,985 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 24 | #3,246 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 17 | #4,161 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 14 | #4,495 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 17 | #3,873 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 11 | #5,199 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 22 | #3,079 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 13 | #4,432 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 9 | #5,815 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 8 | #6,123 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,903 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 11 | #4,380 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 15 | #3,425 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 11 | #4,101 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,885 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,974 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,922 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,990 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,910 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,831 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,194 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 25 | #2,289 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 24 | #2,323 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 29 | #2,031 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 27 | #2,088 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 25 | #2,164 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,434 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,808 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,458 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,401 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,417 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,379 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,351 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 51 | #1,215 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,137 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,216 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,209 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,084 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,078 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 77 | #815 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,031 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 56 | #953 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 51 | #985 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 57 | #906 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 81 | #756 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 53 | #950 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 85 | #707 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 77 | #772 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 69 | #827 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 94 | #721 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 76 | #812 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 100 | #707 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 117 | #668 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 87 | #775 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 125 | #659 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 121 | #678 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 127 | #658 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 150 | #586 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 151 | #589 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 127 | #642 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 136 | #605 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 146 | #591 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 102 | #681 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 131 | #588 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 120 | #596 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 115 | #523 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 89 | #539 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 104 | #469 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 73 | #485 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 85 | #433 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 77 | #420 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 73 | #424 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 41 | #578 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 43 | #534 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 47 | #493 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 42 | #510 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 46 | #474 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 48 | #457 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 19 | #759 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 43 | #517 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 21 | #693 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 25 | #660 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 28 | #578 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 25 | #627 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 31 | #535 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 16 | #770 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 23 | #609 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 14 | #820 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 15 | #715 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 9 | #982 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 17 | #631 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 14 | #708 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 10 | #773 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 15 | #595 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,002 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 8 | #829 |
| 1883 | 0 | – | 8 | #734 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 7 | #783 |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 12 | #495 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 8 | #658 |
Highest rank
Magnolia has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #138 in 2024. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2020s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Magnolia
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.