Is Nash a boy or girl name?
Nash is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 15 girls and 1,464 boys were named Nash, so 1% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.6% of the 21,211 US babies named Nash were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #240
- Girl rank, 2024
- #7,465
- Babies named Nash since 1910
- 21,211
- Most popular year
- 2021
- 1,607 babies
Boys and girls named Nash, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 84 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 158 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 114 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 115 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 112 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 62 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 145 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 292 | 6 | 2% |
| 1990s | 1,072 | 12 | 1.1% |
| 2000s | 2,376 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 9,255 | 46 | 0.5% |
| 2020s | 7,291 | 71 | 1% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1,464 | #240 | 15 | #7,465 |
| 2023 | 1,332 | #259 | 10 | #10,104 |
| 2022 | 1,407 | #251 | 8 | #11,919 |
| 2021 | 1,588 | #233 | 19 | #6,335 |
| 2020 | 1,500 | #240 | 19 | #6,251 |
| 2019 | 1,441 | #254 | 11 | #9,558 |
| 2018 | 1,408 | #257 | 9 | #11,176 |
| 2017 | 1,284 | #281 | 7 | #13,695 |
| 2016 | 1,261 | #286 | 6 | #15,659 |
| 2015 | 994 | #345 | 6 | #15,848 |
| 2014 | 869 | #365 | 7 | #14,145 |
| 2013 | 601 | #466 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 500 | #525 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 493 | #520 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 404 | #613 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 359 | #678 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 358 | #677 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 328 | #708 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 288 | #743 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 188 | #932 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 167 | #992 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 163 | #980 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 187 | #880 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 170 | #919 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 168 | #920 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 214 | #749 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 204 | #771 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 196 | #761 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 110 | #1,097 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 55 | #1,662 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 55 | #1,658 | 6 | #12,917 |
| 1993 | 53 | #1,677 | 6 | #12,920 |
| 1992 | 52 | #1,672 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 66 | #1,407 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 67 | #1,367 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 50 | #1,607 | 6 | #11,852 |
| 1988 | 50 | #1,510 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 39 | #1,725 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 26 | #2,203 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 24 | #2,272 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 20 | #2,504 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 22 | #2,320 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 29 | #1,923 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 10 | #4,055 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 22 | #2,341 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 23 | #2,213 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 16 | #2,755 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 14 | #3,000 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 11 | #3,408 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 12 | #3,182 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 13 | #2,896 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 19 | #2,187 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 12 | #2,946 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 13 | #2,770 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 12 | #2,832 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 5 | #4,557 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 11 | #2,571 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 7 | #3,510 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 10 | #2,803 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 6 | #3,903 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 13 | #2,388 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 10 | #2,807 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 13 | #2,378 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 10 | #2,756 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 9 | #2,960 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 12 | #2,455 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 14 | #2,197 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 8 | #3,104 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 11 | #2,493 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 10 | #2,627 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 10 | #2,610 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 15 | #2,000 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 6 | #3,589 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 16 | #1,920 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 13 | #2,225 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 12 | #2,234 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 12 | #2,096 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 9 | #2,581 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 9 | #2,680 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 11 | #2,349 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 18 | #1,670 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 9 | #2,619 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 14 | #1,938 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 11 | #2,283 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 11 | #2,292 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 5 | #3,910 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 8 | #2,873 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 12 | #2,218 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 13 | #2,063 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 11 | #2,419 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 12 | #2,292 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 17 | #1,871 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 16 | #1,977 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 20 | #1,743 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 10 | #2,847 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 15 | #2,161 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 19 | #1,851 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 9 | #3,181 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 22 | #1,681 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 16 | #2,115 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 13 | #2,466 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 18 | #1,939 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 12 | #2,464 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 6 | #4,029 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 9 | #2,882 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 15 | #2,018 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 12 | #2,258 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 11 | #2,065 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 9 | #2,045 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 5 | #2,795 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 5 | #1,772 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Nash reached #233 in 2021. As a girl name, it reached #6,251 in 2020. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2020s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Nash
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.