Is Marybeth a boy or girl name?
Marybeth is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 17 girls and 0 boys were named Marybeth, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 10,241 US babies named Marybeth were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #6,812
- Babies named Marybeth since 1909
- 10,241
- Most popular year
- 1961
- 488 babies
Boys and girls named Marybeth, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 5 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 37 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 115 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 139 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 645 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 1,885 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 3,801 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 1,235 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 1,146 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 599 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 372 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 179 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 83 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 17 | #6,812 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 18 | #6,571 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,344 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,316 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,107 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,584 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,562 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 14 | #8,134 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,586 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,863 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 25 | #5,407 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 18 | #6,922 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 18 | #7,055 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 15 | #8,059 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 17 | #7,403 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 29 | #5,039 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 20 | #6,730 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 36 | #4,267 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 36 | #4,123 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 32 | #4,331 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 39 | #3,727 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 38 | #3,705 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 44 | #3,227 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 55 | #2,728 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 43 | #3,196 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 56 | #2,555 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 42 | #3,054 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 39 | #3,077 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 50 | #2,543 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 63 | #2,143 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 43 | #2,828 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 65 | #2,106 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 67 | #2,045 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 75 | #1,889 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 99 | #1,551 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 86 | #1,622 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 113 | #1,290 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 114 | #1,244 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 121 | #1,175 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 121 | #1,175 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 126 | #1,099 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 131 | #1,062 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 116 | #1,185 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 110 | #1,197 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 108 | #1,225 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 120 | #1,122 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 128 | #1,055 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 128 | #1,037 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 95 | #1,200 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 97 | #1,199 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 98 | #1,163 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 123 | #971 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 121 | #990 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 148 | #900 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 177 | #793 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 218 | #674 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 231 | #637 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 269 | #583 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 331 | #521 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 407 | #471 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 479 | #447 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 480 | #443 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 471 | #442 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 488 | #443 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 427 | #475 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 378 | #502 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 271 | #606 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 238 | #634 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 192 | #693 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 155 | #771 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 153 | #751 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 119 | #860 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 131 | #787 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 140 | #742 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 108 | #854 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 101 | #874 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 112 | #826 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 93 | #923 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 71 | #1,001 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,055 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 63 | #986 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,243 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,239 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,260 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,458 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 18 | #1,931 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,686 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 18 | #1,892 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 16 | #1,997 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,592 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,521 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,634 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,475 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,148 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,511 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,068 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,347 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,766 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,431 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,723 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,384 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,230 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,086 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,732 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,257 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,932 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,417 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,223 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,207 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,418 |
Highest rank
Marybeth has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #442 in 1962. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1960s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Marybeth
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.