Is Vonda a boy or girl name?
Vonda was a girl name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 99.9% of the 10,323 US babies named Vonda were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Vonda since 1899
- 10,323
- Most popular year
- 1965
- 1,093 babies
Boys and girls named Vonda, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 5 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 35 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 261 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 599 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 1,050 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 1,181 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 1,625 | 100% |
| 1960s | 11 | 4,005 | 99.7% |
| 1970s | 0 | 1,175 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 246 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 95 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 35 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | – |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 5 | #20,326 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 5 | #19,917 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 5 | #18,704 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 8 | #12,148 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 7 | #13,457 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 5 | #17,536 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 6 | #14,045 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 10 | #9,000 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 9 | #9,558 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 10 | #8,744 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 14 | #6,656 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 11 | #8,036 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 14 | #6,644 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 12 | #7,416 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 9 | #9,222 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 16 | #5,541 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 16 | #5,315 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 11 | #6,780 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 21 | #4,023 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 30 | #3,082 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 29 | #3,066 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 22 | #3,682 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 35 | #2,704 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 26 | #3,337 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 40 | #2,436 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 36 | #2,578 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 43 | #2,190 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 50 | #1,973 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 62 | #1,618 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 85 | #1,308 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 106 | #1,105 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 133 | #929 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 162 | #822 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 215 | #712 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 283 | #613 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 236 | #650 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 330 | #526 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 321 | #529 |
| 1966 | 5 | #4,516 | 664 | #349 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 1,093 | #261 |
| 1964 | 6 | #4,022 | 602 | #399 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 180 | #772 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 183 | #771 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 208 | #720 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 188 | #746 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 190 | #740 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 183 | #731 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 199 | #706 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 160 | #781 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 169 | #732 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 163 | #725 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 147 | #755 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 138 | #760 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 135 | #759 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 141 | #722 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 151 | #682 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 108 | #843 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 111 | #836 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 113 | #776 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 85 | #822 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 105 | #746 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 120 | #698 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 124 | #674 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 127 | #632 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 137 | #595 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 177 | #505 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 132 | #601 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 126 | #601 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 110 | #634 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 94 | #692 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 93 | #696 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 69 | #807 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 86 | #729 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 76 | #774 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 87 | #754 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 79 | #797 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 61 | #961 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 66 | #923 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 64 | #940 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 58 | #987 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 70 | #913 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 60 | #964 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,029 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 51 | #1,071 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,310 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,120 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 38 | #1,233 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,333 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,276 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,189 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,226 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 19 | #1,356 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 12 | #1,716 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 15 | #1,238 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,767 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,755 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,425 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,288 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,942 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,219 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,835 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Vonda reached #4,022 in 1964. As a girl name, it reached #261 in 1965. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1960s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.