Is Maryelizabeth a boy or girl name?
Maryelizabeth is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 16 girls and 0 boys were named Maryelizabeth, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 2,081 US babies named Maryelizabeth were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #7,104
- Babies named Maryelizabeth since 1906
- 2,081
- Most popular year
- 2001
- 53 babies
Boys and girls named Maryelizabeth, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 15 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 105 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 52 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 22 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 42 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 66 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 168 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 211 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 367 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 376 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 362 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 219 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 76 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,104 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 10 | #10,069 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,376 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 20 | #6,086 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 11 | #9,319 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,333 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,297 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 13 | #8,606 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 22 | #5,917 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 21 | #6,165 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 28 | #4,981 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 30 | #4,712 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,830 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 20 | #6,485 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 27 | #5,200 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 21 | #6,467 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 41 | #3,908 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 28 | #5,185 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 32 | #4,538 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 41 | #3,625 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 31 | #4,451 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 36 | #3,850 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 39 | #3,507 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 53 | #2,798 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 40 | #3,384 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 33 | #3,690 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 41 | #3,096 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 29 | #3,867 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 38 | #3,123 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 40 | #2,960 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 35 | #3,281 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 38 | #3,086 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 40 | #2,957 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 44 | #2,724 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 38 | #2,999 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 34 | #3,139 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 44 | #2,475 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 40 | #2,554 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 38 | #2,597 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 49 | #2,156 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 36 | #2,602 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 28 | #3,036 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 42 | #2,347 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 36 | #2,595 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 20 | #3,937 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 19 | #3,989 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 30 | #2,777 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 31 | #2,697 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 25 | #2,975 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,062 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 19 | #3,512 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 19 | #3,419 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 14 | #4,225 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 17 | #3,743 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 21 | #3,169 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,920 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,932 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 16 | #3,279 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 15 | #3,353 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 16 | #3,217 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,639 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 22 | #2,674 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,999 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 15 | #3,416 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 13 | #3,620 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 16 | #3,059 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,860 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 6 | #5,843 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 5 | #6,554 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 5 | #6,311 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 8 | #4,360 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,676 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 8 | #4,200 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,479 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 8 | #4,221 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,292 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,116 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,837 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,180 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,700 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,683 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,753 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,010 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,912 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,567 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,854 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,293 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,897 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,486 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,933 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,622 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,280 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,767 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,107 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 5 | #3,997 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 14 | #1,647 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 9 | #2,079 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,722 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 7 | #2,060 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,419 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,270 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,128 |
Highest rank
Maryelizabeth has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #1,647 in 1913. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2000s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Maryelizabeth
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.