Is Maud a boy or girl name?
Maud was a girl name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 99.8% of the 13,190 US babies named Maud were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #14,595
- Babies named Maud since 1880
- 13,190
- Most popular year
- 1886
- 483 babies
Boys and girls named Maud, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 21 | 4,201 | 99.5% |
| 1890s | 5 | 3,285 | 99.8% |
| 1900s | 5 | 1,836 | 99.7% |
| 1910s | 0 | 1,629 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 1,240 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 442 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 205 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 134 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 73 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 35 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 17 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 16 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 12 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 22 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 12 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 6 | #14,595 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 6 | #14,693 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 5 | #17,292 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 5 | #17,527 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 6 | #15,879 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 6 | #15,864 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 7 | #13,132 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 5 | #17,006 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 5 | #15,253 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 6 | #12,874 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 5 | #14,551 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 6 | #10,723 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 5 | #12,093 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 6 | #9,895 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 8 | #6,628 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 9 | #5,869 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 8 | #6,335 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 10 | #5,285 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 9 | #5,314 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 7 | #6,022 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 5 | #7,467 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 6 | #6,292 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 11 | #4,112 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 8 | #5,296 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 7 | #5,651 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,776 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 11 | #4,081 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 6 | #6,007 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 13 | #3,494 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,101 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,833 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,714 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 13 | #3,265 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,568 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,326 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 21 | #2,231 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,312 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,384 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,915 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,258 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,285 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,860 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,722 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,618 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,956 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,406 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,622 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,094 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,075 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,191 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,338 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,065 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,070 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 49 | #994 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 65 | #866 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,068 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 70 | #858 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 80 | #786 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 79 | #813 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 110 | #695 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 118 | #667 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 128 | #650 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 133 | #651 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 157 | #573 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 145 | #597 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 131 | #648 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 159 | #569 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 162 | #541 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 182 | #504 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 168 | #514 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 165 | #509 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 182 | #458 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 175 | #399 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 168 | #372 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 149 | #377 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 135 | #342 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 143 | #320 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 122 | #330 |
| 1908 | 5 | #1,529 | 138 | #303 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 143 | #292 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 181 | #240 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 192 | #224 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 159 | #249 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 176 | #224 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 218 | #198 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 221 | #186 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 286 | #186 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 244 | #175 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 262 | #177 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 270 | #165 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 298 | #157 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 305 | #145 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 333 | #129 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 366 | #119 |
| 1892 | 5 | #1,193 | 402 | #112 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 366 | #108 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 439 | #97 |
| 1889 | 5 | #1,057 | 432 | #92 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 469 | #86 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 402 | #83 |
| 1886 | 5 | #1,057 | 478 | #74 |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 429 | #75 |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 461 | #72 |
| 1883 | 5 | #998 | 425 | #68 |
| 1882 | 0 | – | 432 | #69 |
| 1881 | 6 | #836 | 328 | #71 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 345 | #70 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Maud reached #836 in 1881. As a girl name, it reached #68 in 1883. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1880s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Maud
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.