Is Maude a boy or girl name?
Maude is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 41 girls and 0 boys were named Maude, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.7% of the 45,841 US babies named Maude were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #3,724
- Babies named Maude since 1880
- 45,841
- Most popular year
- 1888
- 1,406 babies
Boys and girls named Maude, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 48 | 11,454 | 99.6% |
| 1890s | 50 | 11,304 | 99.6% |
| 1900s | 12 | 7,142 | 99.8% |
| 1910s | 13 | 6,713 | 99.8% |
| 1920s | 10 | 4,536 | 99.8% |
| 1930s | 0 | 1,810 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 1,062 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 647 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 302 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 145 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 109 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 95 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 86 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 158 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 145 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 41 | #3,724 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 32 | #4,418 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 37 | #4,014 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 18 | #6,588 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 17 | #6,819 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 25 | #5,254 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 25 | #5,273 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 17 | #6,995 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 17 | #7,115 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,488 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,939 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 17 | #7,273 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 10 | #10,972 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 9 | #11,836 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 7 | #14,444 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 11 | #10,420 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 8 | #13,380 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 5 | #19,493 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 7 | #14,583 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 7 | #13,968 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 12 | #9,070 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 12 | #8,867 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 10 | #9,986 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 7 | #12,962 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 7 | #12,656 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 9 | #10,037 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 8 | #10,766 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 10 | #8,787 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 7 | #11,348 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 10 | #8,506 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 10 | #8,557 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 8 | #10,209 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 9 | #9,225 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 13 | #6,846 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 11 | #7,664 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 14 | #6,026 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 11 | #6,946 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 14 | #5,488 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 9 | #7,512 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 10 | #6,763 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 8 | #7,870 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 9 | #7,077 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 13 | #5,419 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 10 | #6,633 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 11 | #6,174 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 10 | #6,510 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 7 | #8,198 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 9 | #6,666 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 10 | #5,861 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,065 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 14 | #4,360 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 22 | #3,083 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 20 | #3,241 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 13 | #4,454 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 24 | #2,905 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 17 | #3,410 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,933 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 27 | #2,358 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 26 | #2,392 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 26 | #2,385 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 27 | #2,390 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 34 | #2,045 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 34 | #2,011 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,781 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,611 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 52 | #1,508 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 42 | #1,672 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 64 | #1,329 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 71 | #1,240 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,378 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 63 | #1,253 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 72 | #1,143 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 76 | #1,086 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 69 | #1,129 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 85 | #994 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 108 | #852 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 87 | #935 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 100 | #883 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 87 | #895 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 95 | #771 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 101 | #761 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 110 | #740 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 117 | #688 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 112 | #668 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 145 | #583 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 135 | #577 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 142 | #577 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 154 | #535 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 163 | #513 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 172 | #481 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 195 | #463 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 182 | #477 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 192 | #477 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 217 | #439 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 258 | #407 |
| 1929 | 5 | #4,348 | 271 | #403 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 292 | #392 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 348 | #368 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 387 | #336 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 461 | #310 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 485 | #304 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 472 | #298 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 534 | #281 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 591 | #276 |
| 1920 | 5 | #4,721 | 695 | #249 |
| 1919 | 8 | #3,290 | 674 | #246 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 727 | #237 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 728 | #228 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 739 | #223 |
| 1915 | 5 | #4,184 | 771 | #214 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 693 | #192 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 655 | #179 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 598 | #169 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 553 | #145 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 575 | #141 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 520 | #138 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 510 | #137 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 585 | #112 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 619 | #105 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 709 | #97 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 757 | #86 |
| 1903 | 7 | #980 | 776 | #83 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 834 | #80 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 819 | #77 |
| 1900 | 5 | #1,433 | 1,013 | #77 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 908 | #66 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 1,009 | #67 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 984 | #62 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 1,104 | #56 |
| 1895 | 6 | #1,042 | 1,136 | #56 |
| 1894 | 13 | #585 | 1,144 | #53 |
| 1893 | 6 | #986 | 1,202 | #49 |
| 1892 | 5 | #1,194 | 1,270 | #45 |
| 1891 | 12 | #549 | 1,188 | #44 |
| 1890 | 8 | #793 | 1,359 | #39 |
| 1889 | 9 | #704 | 1,293 | #36 |
| 1888 | 10 | #682 | 1,396 | #32 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 1,162 | #31 |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 1,189 | #30 |
| 1885 | 6 | #897 | 1,222 | #24 |
| 1884 | 6 | #929 | 1,225 | #24 |
| 1883 | 6 | #855 | 1,096 | #22 |
| 1882 | 5 | #1,042 | 1,089 | #20 |
| 1881 | 6 | #837 | 923 | #21 |
| 1880 | 0 | – | 859 | #21 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Maude reached #549 in 1891. As a girl name, it reached #20 in 1882. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1880s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Maude
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.