Is Mimi a boy or girl name?
Mimi is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 24 girls and 0 boys were named Mimi, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 6,933 US babies named Mimi were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #5,378
- Babies named Mimi since 1900
- 6,933
- Most popular year
- 1961
- 168 babies
Boys and girls named Mimi, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 24 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 181 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 330 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 411 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 646 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 1,281 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 1,333 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 637 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 589 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 627 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 515 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 254 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 105 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 24 | #5,378 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 17 | #6,835 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 26 | #5,123 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,327 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,243 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,561 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,637 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 21 | #5,967 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 20 | #6,338 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 23 | #5,780 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 25 | #5,415 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 27 | #5,102 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 31 | #4,677 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 40 | #3,819 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 29 | #4,931 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 39 | #3,996 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 59 | #2,982 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 51 | #3,315 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 47 | #3,453 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 63 | #2,700 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 62 | #2,668 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 36 | #3,855 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 48 | #3,049 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 66 | #2,399 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 44 | #3,150 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 64 | #2,329 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 57 | #2,447 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 64 | #2,168 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 69 | #2,032 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 59 | #2,272 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 62 | #2,178 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 71 | #1,979 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 63 | #2,149 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 61 | #2,174 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 57 | #2,245 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 60 | #2,090 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 74 | #1,728 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 43 | #2,423 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 41 | #2,454 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 60 | #1,875 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 55 | #1,914 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 58 | #1,831 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 61 | #1,799 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 59 | #1,859 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 78 | #1,524 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 47 | #2,139 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 51 | #1,929 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 56 | #1,822 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,926 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 65 | #1,553 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 65 | #1,513 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 68 | #1,439 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 73 | #1,374 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 86 | #1,285 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 79 | #1,340 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 106 | #1,074 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 97 | #1,083 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 126 | #913 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 113 | #958 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 139 | #851 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 139 | #883 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 135 | #904 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 160 | #831 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 168 | #811 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 150 | #849 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 135 | #897 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 132 | #891 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 130 | #896 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 156 | #796 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 146 | #801 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 138 | #800 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 121 | #846 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 117 | #853 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 107 | #869 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 99 | #891 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 86 | #969 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 96 | #887 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 79 | #999 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 67 | #1,040 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 66 | #951 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 64 | #979 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 66 | #984 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 54 | #1,072 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,216 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,432 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,048 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,040 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 52 | #976 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,109 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,036 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,118 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,257 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,258 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,253 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,268 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,190 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,418 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,252 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,866 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 40 | #1,246 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,593 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,485 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,530 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,425 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,368 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,415 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,079 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,540 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 31 | #1,323 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,216 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 18 | #1,587 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 9 | #2,279 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 14 | #1,518 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,744 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 12 | #1,402 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 6 | #2,155 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 6 | #2,028 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,531 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,128 |
Highest rank
Mimi has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #796 in 1956. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1960s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.