Is Toney a boy or girl name?
Toney was a boy name in the US. Across 1880–2024, 2.9% of the 6,604 US babies named Toney were girls. Fewer than 10 babies were given the name in 2024.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #12,169
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Toney since 1880
- 6,604
- Most popular year
- 1961
- 193 babies
Boys and girls named Toney, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 82 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 79 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 112 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 340 | 5 | 1.4% |
| 1920s | 404 | 12 | 2.9% |
| 1930s | 319 | 5 | 1.5% |
| 1940s | 574 | 29 | 4.8% |
| 1950s | 1,053 | 48 | 4.4% |
| 1960s | 1,425 | 41 | 2.8% |
| 1970s | 678 | 35 | 4.9% |
| 1980s | 550 | 12 | 2.1% |
| 1990s | 400 | 7 | 1.7% |
| 2000s | 226 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 130 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 38 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6 | #12,169 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 9 | #8,846 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 6 | #12,174 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 7 | #10,688 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 10 | #7,994 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 9 | #8,814 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 8 | #9,579 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 8 | #9,599 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 14 | #6,315 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 10 | #7,987 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 14 | #6,275 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 10 | #8,049 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 20 | #4,843 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 17 | #5,410 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 20 | #4,828 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 17 | #5,530 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 9 | #8,945 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 27 | #3,884 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 21 | #4,501 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 20 | #4,451 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 21 | #4,253 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 22 | #3,966 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 34 | #2,813 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 33 | #2,854 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 22 | #3,751 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 18 | #4,145 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 30 | #2,774 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 33 | #2,499 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 36 | #2,295 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 45 | #1,911 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 43 | #1,970 | 7 | #11,708 |
| 1993 | 34 | #2,287 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 57 | #1,567 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 56 | #1,556 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 48 | #1,699 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 66 | #1,361 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 53 | #1,465 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 45 | #1,585 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 49 | #1,437 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 57 | #1,279 | 6 | #10,606 |
| 1984 | 57 | #1,224 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 48 | #1,359 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 73 | #1,070 | 6 | #10,439 |
| 1981 | 48 | #1,371 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 54 | #1,271 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 61 | #1,167 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 46 | #1,370 | 6 | #9,667 |
| 1977 | 47 | #1,334 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 53 | #1,189 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 57 | #1,125 | 5 | #10,507 |
| 1974 | 71 | #977 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 63 | #1,022 | 9 | #6,047 |
| 1972 | 94 | #833 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 72 | #965 | 5 | #9,556 |
| 1970 | 114 | #774 | 10 | #5,385 |
| 1969 | 113 | #739 | 5 | #8,614 |
| 1968 | 111 | #716 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 142 | #633 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 148 | #612 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 133 | #648 | 6 | #6,481 |
| 1964 | 138 | #661 | 6 | #6,713 |
| 1963 | 155 | #628 | 6 | #6,539 |
| 1962 | 159 | #611 | 5 | #7,502 |
| 1961 | 187 | #581 | 6 | #6,511 |
| 1960 | 139 | #668 | 7 | #5,655 |
| 1959 | 172 | #597 | 6 | #6,183 |
| 1958 | 154 | #621 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 103 | #742 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 105 | #717 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 128 | #652 | 5 | #6,651 |
| 1954 | 93 | #744 | 5 | #6,555 |
| 1953 | 86 | #767 | 8 | #4,570 |
| 1952 | 67 | #860 | 11 | #3,537 |
| 1951 | 81 | #784 | 7 | #4,791 |
| 1950 | 64 | #864 | 6 | #5,251 |
| 1949 | 66 | #847 | 5 | #5,992 |
| 1948 | 59 | #899 | 6 | #5,195 |
| 1947 | 66 | #859 | 7 | #4,733 |
| 1946 | 72 | #783 | 5 | #5,637 |
| 1945 | 52 | #883 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 47 | #947 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 44 | #1,015 | 6 | #4,652 |
| 1942 | 60 | #850 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 50 | #903 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 58 | #829 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 32 | #1,164 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 41 | #1,005 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 31 | #1,210 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 35 | #1,117 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 40 | #1,017 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 35 | #1,131 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 25 | #1,360 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 30 | #1,252 | 5 | #5,024 |
| 1931 | 31 | #1,250 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 19 | #1,747 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 35 | #1,191 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 46 | #1,030 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 36 | #1,223 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 33 | #1,276 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 43 | #1,069 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 44 | #1,090 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 40 | #1,139 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 40 | #1,138 | 7 | #4,395 |
| 1921 | 43 | #1,084 | 5 | #5,791 |
| 1920 | 44 | #1,070 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 50 | #958 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 47 | #984 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 55 | #863 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 33 | #1,155 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 45 | #939 | 5 | #4,891 |
| 1914 | 40 | #867 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 26 | #990 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 25 | #913 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 9 | #1,286 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 10 | #1,113 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 20 | #611 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 5 | #1,573 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 11 | #860 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 7 | #1,104 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 12 | #736 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 10 | #807 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 10 | #777 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 8 | #923 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 10 | #725 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 19 | #574 | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 7 | #924 | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 9 | #800 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 7 | #936 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 7 | #975 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 13 | #593 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 8 | #831 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 7 | #947 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 11 | #590 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 10 | #664 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 16 | #501 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 10 | #629 | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 11 | #598 | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 9 | #694 | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 10 | #656 | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 5 | #1,027 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 8 | #748 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 6 | #858 | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 7 | #801 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Toney reached #501 in 1888. As a girl name, it reached #3,537 in 1952. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1960s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Toney
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.