Is Mitchel a boy or girl name?
Mitchel is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 13 boys were named Mitchel, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 0.2% of the 13,298 US babies named Mitchel were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #6,681
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Mitchel since 1880
- 13,298
- Most popular year
- 1994
- 407 babies
Boys and girls named Mitchel, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 37 | 0 | 0% |
| 1890s | 68 | 0 | 0% |
| 1900s | 81 | 0 | 0% |
| 1910s | 411 | 0 | 0% |
| 1920s | 531 | 0 | 0% |
| 1930s | 399 | 0 | 0% |
| 1940s | 716 | 0 | 0% |
| 1950s | 1,838 | 0 | 0% |
| 1960s | 1,633 | 0 | 0% |
| 1970s | 884 | 0 | 0% |
| 1980s | 1,774 | 12 | 0.7% |
| 1990s | 3,204 | 0 | 0% |
| 2000s | 1,311 | 10 | 0.8% |
| 2010s | 318 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 71 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13 | #6,681 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 18 | #5,390 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 14 | #6,369 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 12 | #6,961 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 14 | #6,184 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 23 | #4,430 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 25 | #4,176 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 25 | #4,193 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 25 | #4,164 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 22 | #4,496 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 30 | #3,589 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 27 | #3,823 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 36 | #3,152 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 56 | #2,303 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 49 | #2,537 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 77 | #1,882 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 88 | #1,730 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 84 | #1,767 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 103 | #1,485 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 117 | #1,306 | 5 | #18,311 |
| 2004 | 124 | #1,230 | 5 | #17,925 |
| 2003 | 150 | #1,042 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 173 | #927 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 170 | #918 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 225 | #752 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 246 | #686 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 274 | #643 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 299 | #594 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 323 | #567 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 366 | #528 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 407 | #499 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 375 | #531 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 289 | #607 | 0 | – |
| 1991 | 313 | #571 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 312 | #574 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 269 | #597 | 6 | #11,827 |
| 1988 | 247 | #595 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 236 | #589 | 6 | #10,772 |
| 1986 | 199 | #634 | 0 | – |
| 1985 | 161 | #695 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 163 | #678 | 0 | – |
| 1983 | 132 | #754 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 135 | #759 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 130 | #767 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 102 | #890 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 89 | #933 | 0 | – |
| 1978 | 88 | #925 | 0 | – |
| 1977 | 67 | #1,060 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 80 | #936 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 94 | #860 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 76 | #940 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 86 | #858 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 107 | #774 | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 100 | #810 | 0 | – |
| 1970 | 97 | #823 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 103 | #769 | 0 | – |
| 1968 | 130 | #663 | 0 | – |
| 1967 | 107 | #717 | 0 | – |
| 1966 | 144 | #618 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 128 | #657 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 179 | #591 | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 197 | #565 | 0 | – |
| 1962 | 203 | #554 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 217 | #540 | 0 | – |
| 1960 | 225 | #529 | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 252 | #494 | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 260 | #486 | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 202 | #544 | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 196 | #537 | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 192 | #531 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 155 | #595 | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 161 | #561 | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 161 | #552 | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 135 | #600 | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 124 | #618 | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 118 | #631 | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 101 | #672 | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 82 | #761 | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 78 | #750 | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 57 | #836 | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 56 | #850 | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 69 | #793 | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 56 | #886 | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 55 | #853 | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 44 | #978 | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 41 | #1,002 | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 47 | #925 | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 33 | #1,158 | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 28 | #1,263 | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 39 | #1,037 | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 50 | #894 | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 36 | #1,100 | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 40 | #1,073 | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 45 | #993 | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 40 | #1,108 | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 45 | #1,023 | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 45 | #1,038 | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 52 | #972 | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 60 | #871 | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 55 | #912 | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 47 | #1,041 | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 48 | #1,020 | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 60 | #901 | 0 | – |
| 1921 | 56 | #946 | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 63 | #860 | 0 | – |
| 1919 | 61 | #845 | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 56 | #892 | 0 | – |
| 1917 | 48 | #930 | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 47 | #934 | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 53 | #852 | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 47 | #774 | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 36 | #794 | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 34 | #747 | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 19 | #749 | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 10 | #1,094 | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 9 | #1,058 | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 12 | #811 | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 16 | #654 | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 6 | #1,204 | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 6 | #1,191 | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 10 | #796 | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 9 | #825 | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 7 | #993 | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 6 | #1,024 | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1898 | 5 | #1,245 | 0 | – |
| 1897 | 7 | #908 | 0 | – |
| 1896 | 8 | #872 | 0 | – |
| 1895 | 10 | #732 | 0 | – |
| 1894 | 6 | #1,042 | 0 | – |
| 1893 | 10 | #691 | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 11 | #671 | 0 | – |
| 1891 | 6 | #922 | 0 | – |
| 1890 | 5 | #1,107 | 0 | – |
| 1889 | 9 | #708 | 0 | – |
| 1888 | 7 | #886 | 0 | – |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1883 | 5 | #1,001 | 0 | – |
| 1882 | 10 | #633 | 0 | – |
| 1881 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1880 | 6 | #880 | 0 | – |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Mitchel reached #486 in 1958. As a girl name, it reached #10,772 in 1987. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1990s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Mitchel
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.