Is Montez a boy or girl name?
Montez is a boy name in the US. In 2024, 0 girls and 46 boys were named Montez, so 0% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 18.8% of the 3,920 US babies named Montez were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- #2,811
- Girl rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Babies named Montez since 1907
- 3,920
- Most popular year
- 1991
- 110 babies
Boys and girls named Montez, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 19 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 128 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 204 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 149 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 81 | 100% |
| 1950s | 19 | 63 | 76.8% |
| 1960s | 87 | 51 | 37% |
| 1970s | 347 | 25 | 6.7% |
| 1980s | 631 | 12 | 1.9% |
| 1990s | 854 | 5 | 0.6% |
| 2000s | 608 | 0 | 0% |
| 2010s | 441 | 0 | 0% |
| 2020s | 196 | 0 | 0% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 46 | #2,811 | 0 | – |
| 2023 | 35 | #3,392 | 0 | – |
| 2022 | 38 | #3,195 | 0 | – |
| 2021 | 40 | #3,059 | 0 | – |
| 2020 | 37 | #3,112 | 0 | – |
| 2019 | 40 | #3,036 | 0 | – |
| 2018 | 29 | #3,760 | 0 | – |
| 2017 | 32 | #3,493 | 0 | – |
| 2016 | 36 | #3,202 | 0 | – |
| 2015 | 50 | #2,512 | 0 | – |
| 2014 | 45 | #2,692 | 0 | – |
| 2013 | 49 | #2,512 | 0 | – |
| 2012 | 48 | #2,580 | 0 | – |
| 2011 | 56 | #2,304 | 0 | – |
| 2010 | 56 | #2,311 | 0 | – |
| 2009 | 56 | #2,341 | 0 | – |
| 2008 | 68 | #2,051 | 0 | – |
| 2007 | 64 | #2,130 | 0 | – |
| 2006 | 62 | #2,119 | 0 | – |
| 2005 | 54 | #2,227 | 0 | – |
| 2004 | 60 | #2,016 | 0 | – |
| 2003 | 55 | #2,072 | 0 | – |
| 2002 | 64 | #1,808 | 0 | – |
| 2001 | 60 | #1,860 | 0 | – |
| 2000 | 65 | #1,737 | 0 | – |
| 1999 | 77 | #1,486 | 0 | – |
| 1998 | 68 | #1,568 | 0 | – |
| 1997 | 84 | #1,343 | 0 | – |
| 1996 | 67 | #1,507 | 0 | – |
| 1995 | 94 | #1,199 | 0 | – |
| 1994 | 79 | #1,318 | 0 | – |
| 1993 | 95 | #1,153 | 0 | – |
| 1992 | 88 | #1,193 | 5 | #14,755 |
| 1991 | 110 | #1,036 | 0 | – |
| 1990 | 92 | #1,126 | 0 | – |
| 1989 | 91 | #1,111 | 0 | – |
| 1988 | 78 | #1,137 | 0 | – |
| 1987 | 78 | #1,091 | 0 | – |
| 1986 | 72 | #1,109 | 7 | #9,226 |
| 1985 | 55 | #1,298 | 0 | – |
| 1984 | 48 | #1,379 | 5 | #11,565 |
| 1983 | 70 | #1,065 | 0 | – |
| 1982 | 49 | #1,352 | 0 | – |
| 1981 | 47 | #1,387 | 0 | – |
| 1980 | 43 | #1,463 | 0 | – |
| 1979 | 32 | #1,776 | 9 | #7,109 |
| 1978 | 43 | #1,427 | 5 | #10,834 |
| 1977 | 37 | #1,531 | 0 | – |
| 1976 | 36 | #1,528 | 0 | – |
| 1975 | 43 | #1,334 | 0 | – |
| 1974 | 41 | #1,346 | 0 | – |
| 1973 | 39 | #1,342 | 0 | – |
| 1972 | 27 | #1,710 | 6 | #7,910 |
| 1971 | 24 | #1,850 | 5 | #9,173 |
| 1970 | 25 | #1,780 | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 20 | #1,897 | 10 | #4,935 |
| 1968 | 20 | #1,815 | 6 | #6,758 |
| 1967 | 10 | #2,719 | 7 | #5,862 |
| 1966 | 12 | #2,416 | 0 | – |
| 1965 | 8 | #3,166 | 0 | – |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 6 | #6,529 |
| 1963 | 9 | #2,994 | 6 | #6,367 |
| 1962 | 8 | #3,222 | 0 | – |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 8 | #5,158 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 8 | #5,045 |
| 1959 | 5 | #4,382 | 9 | #4,530 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 6 | #5,898 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,840 |
| 1955 | 9 | #2,911 | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 8 | #4,543 |
| 1953 | 5 | #4,179 | 5 | #6,270 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,717 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,913 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,864 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,792 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,385 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,161 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,389 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,593 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,416 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,359 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,791 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,750 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,874 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,689 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,278 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,664 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,075 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 19 | #1,818 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,020 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,616 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 19 | #1,851 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,180 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,537 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,070 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 18 | #2,151 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,757 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,734 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,667 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,241 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,765 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,095 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 19 | #2,051 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,685 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,939 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,585 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,003 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,343 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 15 | #1,793 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 8 | #2,481 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 7 | #2,551 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,440 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,794 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,761 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Montez reached #1,036 in 1991. As a girl name, it reached #1,585 in 1917. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 1990s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Montez
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.