Is Nada a boy or girl name?
Nada is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 32 girls and 0 boys were named Nada, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 5,097 US babies named Nada were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #4,428
- Babies named Nada since 1892
- 5,097
- Most popular year
- 2000
- 78 babies
Boys and girls named Nada, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 46 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 81 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 250 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 556 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 602 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 432 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 458 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 292 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 279 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 325 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 475 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 601 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 540 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 160 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 32 | #4,428 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 33 | #4,332 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 32 | #4,437 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 27 | #4,920 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 36 | #3,982 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 34 | #4,238 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 52 | #3,145 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 44 | #3,529 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 56 | #3,001 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 52 | #3,201 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 64 | #2,730 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 53 | #3,114 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 72 | #2,532 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 51 | #3,256 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 62 | #2,831 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 66 | #2,744 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 48 | #3,458 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 51 | #3,316 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 64 | #2,771 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 46 | #3,352 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 51 | #3,058 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 57 | #2,761 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 74 | #2,244 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 66 | #2,401 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 78 | #2,099 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 77 | #2,032 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 56 | #2,484 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 50 | #2,579 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 47 | #2,658 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 32 | #3,469 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 52 | #2,448 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 50 | #2,510 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 45 | #2,715 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 38 | #3,024 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 28 | #3,786 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 45 | #2,554 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 37 | #2,846 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 22 | #3,937 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 38 | #2,599 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 22 | #3,805 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 25 | #3,392 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 33 | #2,709 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 29 | #3,067 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 37 | #2,552 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 37 | #2,577 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 25 | #3,305 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 25 | #3,166 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 30 | #2,757 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 22 | #3,250 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 29 | #2,659 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 33 | #2,376 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 22 | #3,087 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 29 | #2,492 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 29 | #2,578 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 35 | #2,259 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 34 | #2,194 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 24 | #2,602 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,838 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 23 | #2,550 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 28 | #2,280 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 29 | #2,289 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 30 | #2,200 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 26 | #2,397 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 31 | #2,137 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,650 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,663 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 43 | #1,648 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,622 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,544 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,658 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,496 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 56 | #1,306 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,546 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,377 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 51 | #1,291 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,366 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,846 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,331 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 39 | #1,409 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 37 | #1,326 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,168 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,188 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,150 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 46 | #1,097 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,042 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 41 | #1,143 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 51 | #1,003 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 53 | #960 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 61 | #874 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 52 | #961 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 72 | #792 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 60 | #874 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 71 | #813 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 72 | #804 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 69 | #865 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 53 | #999 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 67 | #900 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 59 | #996 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 73 | #870 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 52 | #1,059 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 58 | #1,011 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 57 | #1,002 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,099 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,041 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 35 | #1,342 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,362 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 33 | #1,352 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 45 | #1,061 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 34 | #1,241 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,306 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,421 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 15 | #1,580 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 16 | #1,402 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,748 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 18 | #1,054 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 12 | #1,263 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 12 | #1,251 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,599 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,144 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,388 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,224 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,731 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,202 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,290 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,531 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,881 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,139 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,271 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,391 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 5 | #1,641 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,404 |
Highest rank
Nada has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #792 in 1934. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2000s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Nada
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.