Is Nadia a boy or girl name?
Nadia is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 598 girls and 0 boys were named Nadia, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 99.9% of the 46,078 US babies named Nadia were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #513
- Babies named Nadia since 1911
- 46,078
- Most popular year
- 2005
- 1,923 babies
Boys and girls named Nadia, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0 | 97 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 151 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 166 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 157 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 355 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 536 | 100% |
| 1970s | 17 | 3,075 | 99.5% |
| 1980s | 22 | 5,533 | 99.6% |
| 1990s | 12 | 7,134 | 99.8% |
| 2000s | 11 | 15,665 | 99.9% |
| 2010s | 0 | 9,863 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 3,284 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 598 | #513 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 624 | #489 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 720 | #437 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 684 | #459 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 658 | #468 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 755 | #416 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 778 | #397 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 781 | #405 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 915 | #358 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 952 | #346 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 1,126 | #289 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 996 | #326 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 1,090 | #293 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 1,182 | #270 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 1,288 | #247 |
| 2009 | 5 | #13,864 | 1,345 | #246 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 1,540 | #219 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 1,721 | #198 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 1,870 | #188 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 1,923 | #178 |
| 2004 | 6 | #10,906 | 1,585 | #214 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 1,580 | #208 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 1,499 | #216 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 1,331 | #239 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 1,271 | #256 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 916 | #330 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 943 | #319 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 857 | #333 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 779 | #356 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 681 | #389 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 548 | #462 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 572 | #437 |
| 1992 | 6 | #8,128 | 593 | #425 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 586 | #433 |
| 1990 | 6 | #7,796 | 659 | #396 |
| 1989 | 9 | #5,460 | 762 | #332 |
| 1988 | 8 | #5,560 | 741 | #334 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 532 | #419 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 476 | #454 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 515 | #428 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 665 | #347 |
| 1983 | 5 | #6,973 | 375 | #512 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 445 | #472 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 476 | #453 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 546 | #410 |
| 1979 | 5 | #6,735 | 609 | #372 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 610 | #353 |
| 1977 | 7 | #4,947 | 790 | #303 |
| 1976 | 5 | #6,192 | 585 | #360 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 85 | #1,306 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 88 | #1,249 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 77 | #1,323 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 80 | #1,284 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 81 | #1,332 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 70 | #1,460 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 72 | #1,347 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 63 | #1,427 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 47 | #1,677 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 52 | #1,565 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 60 | #1,431 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 53 | #1,571 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 49 | #1,640 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 52 | #1,572 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,942 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 52 | #1,552 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 30 | #2,095 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 44 | #1,620 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,832 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 50 | #1,514 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 36 | #1,765 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 48 | #1,455 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,854 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 32 | #1,768 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,872 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 21 | #2,166 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,869 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 20 | #2,232 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,734 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,704 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,311 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,360 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,215 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,506 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,626 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,428 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,536 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,535 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,411 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,807 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,652 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,754 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,759 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 18 | #1,930 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,449 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 27 | #1,521 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,399 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,472 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,999 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,546 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,687 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,771 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,340 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,455 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,332 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,528 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,465 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,178 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,285 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,620 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,221 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,090 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 9 | #2,284 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,750 |
Highest rank
As a boy name, Nadia reached #4,947 in 1977. As a girl name, it reached #178 in 2005. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2000s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Nadia
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.