Is Naomie a boy or girl name?
Naomie is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 52 girls and 0 boys were named Naomie, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 2,056 US babies named Naomie were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #3,097
- Babies named Naomie since 1902
- 2,056
- Most popular year
- 2010
- 65 babies
Boys and girls named Naomie, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 27 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 91 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 131 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 111 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 46 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 42 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 54 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 107 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 189 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 209 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 358 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 454 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 237 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 52 | #3,097 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 36 | #4,100 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 55 | #3,018 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 43 | #3,596 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 51 | #3,125 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 43 | #3,594 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 42 | #3,652 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 42 | #3,678 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 34 | #4,325 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 36 | #4,123 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 38 | #3,980 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 47 | #3,395 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 53 | #3,158 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 54 | #3,122 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 65 | #2,744 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 41 | #3,849 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 48 | #3,459 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 34 | #4,443 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 37 | #4,061 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 48 | #3,246 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 44 | #3,428 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 35 | #3,932 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 29 | #4,353 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 27 | #4,533 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 15 | #7,048 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 27 | #4,269 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 21 | #5,077 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 26 | #4,208 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 26 | #4,150 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 15 | #6,170 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 17 | #5,622 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 18 | #5,371 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 25 | #4,186 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 15 | #6,158 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 19 | #4,999 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 18 | #4,990 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 20 | #4,432 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 13 | #5,835 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 28 | #3,245 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,794 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 22 | #3,684 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 14 | #5,057 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 21 | #3,865 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 20 | #3,959 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 17 | #4,457 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 12 | #5,635 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 14 | #4,852 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 9 | #6,689 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 19 | #3,626 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 14 | #4,512 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 10 | #5,633 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 15 | #4,101 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 7 | #7,041 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 7 | #7,122 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 5 | #8,279 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 7 | #6,052 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 5 | #7,514 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 6 | #6,331 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 5 | #7,215 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 7 | #5,839 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 5 | #7,316 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 6 | #6,348 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 8 | #5,164 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 5 | #6,933 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 6 | #5,759 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 6 | #5,656 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 6 | #5,562 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 6 | #5,370 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 6 | #5,250 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,613 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 8 | #4,242 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,893 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,962 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,086 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,157 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,292 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 5 | #4,846 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 7 | #3,687 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,414 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,132 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,356 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,684 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 6 | #4,158 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,124 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,603 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,279 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,389 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,868 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,473 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,811 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,233 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,890 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,587 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 17 | #2,244 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 15 | #2,456 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,106 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,690 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,606 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,180 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,513 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,968 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 19 | #1,775 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 9 | #2,572 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 9 | #2,285 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 8 | #2,295 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,446 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,146 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,858 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 5 | #2,083 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,733 |
Highest rank
Naomie has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #1,733 in 1902. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2010s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Naomie
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.