Is Lady a boy or girl name?
Lady is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 18 girls and 0 boys were named Lady, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 2,048 US babies named Lady were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #6,508
- Babies named Lady since 1884
- 2,048
- Most popular year
- 2016
- 48 babies
Boys and girls named Lady, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 26 | 100% |
| 1890s | 0 | 86 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 152 | 100% |
| 1910s | 0 | 221 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 248 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 173 | 100% |
| 1940s | 0 | 118 | 100% |
| 1950s | 0 | 96 | 100% |
| 1960s | 0 | 98 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 102 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 92 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 132 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 170 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 235 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 99 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 18 | #6,508 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 21 | #5,860 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 22 | #5,734 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 17 | #6,859 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 21 | #5,756 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 28 | #4,842 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 30 | #4,621 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 24 | #5,455 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 48 | #3,356 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 11 | #9,853 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,502 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 21 | #6,143 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,646 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 16 | #7,634 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 25 | #5,522 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 17 | #7,537 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 14 | #8,768 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 20 | #6,706 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 20 | #6,495 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 19 | #6,419 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 24 | #5,303 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 17 | #6,760 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 12 | #8,577 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 10 | #9,769 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 17 | #6,358 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 16 | #6,351 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 11 | #8,311 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 12 | #7,529 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 14 | #6,573 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 12 | #7,305 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 12 | #7,372 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 13 | #6,862 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 15 | #6,167 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 16 | #5,807 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 11 | #7,604 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 8 | #9,207 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 9 | #8,061 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 7 | #9,315 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 9 | #7,431 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 12 | #5,850 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 5 | #11,298 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 8 | #7,670 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 13 | #5,372 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 12 | #5,735 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 9 | #7,088 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 8 | #7,657 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 12 | #5,366 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 18 | #3,978 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 9 | #6,319 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 9 | #6,195 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 11 | #5,166 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 14 | #4,251 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 16 | #3,863 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 5 | #8,657 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 7 | #6,283 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,951 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,459 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,676 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 13 | #3,643 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,983 |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 7 | #5,607 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,398 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,708 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,810 |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,161 |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,831 |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 7 | #5,144 |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,315 |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 7 | #4,963 |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 8 | #4,466 |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,092 |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,675 |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,385 |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,839 |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,757 |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 11 | #3,251 |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 14 | #2,834 |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,433 |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 8 | #3,528 |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,853 |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 10 | #3,162 |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 11 | #2,908 |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 12 | #2,600 |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,062 |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 19 | #1,840 |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 18 | #1,910 |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,517 |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 17 | #1,917 |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 18 | #1,880 |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,366 |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 13 | #2,336 |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 16 | #2,082 |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,572 |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 10 | #2,954 |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,859 |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,708 |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 20 | #1,982 |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,803 |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,721 |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,630 |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 22 | #1,869 |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,595 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 28 | #1,597 |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 30 | #1,490 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 29 | #1,466 |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,726 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,488 |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 24 | #1,560 |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 26 | #1,425 |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 23 | #1,322 |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 25 | #1,106 |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 21 | #1,162 |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 10 | #1,597 |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 14 | #1,242 |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 21 | #897 |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 12 | #1,236 |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 17 | #934 |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 15 | #987 |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 14 | #1,038 |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 15 | #949 |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,103 |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,266 |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 13 | #941 |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 25 | #737 |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,006 |
| 1898 | 0 | – | 13 | #989 |
| 1897 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,213 |
| 1896 | 0 | – | 11 | #1,018 |
| 1895 | 0 | – | 9 | #1,164 |
| 1894 | 0 | – | 8 | #1,189 |
| 1893 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,240 |
| 1892 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,220 |
| 1891 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,274 |
| 1890 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,276 |
| 1889 | 0 | – | 13 | #742 |
| 1888 | 0 | – | 7 | #1,087 |
| 1887 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1886 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1885 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1884 | 0 | – | 6 | #975 |
Highest rank
Lady has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #737 in 1900. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2010s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Names spelled like Lady
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.