Is Tirzah a boy or girl name?
Tirzah is a girl name in the US. In 2024, 38 girls and 0 boys were named Tirzah, so 100% were girls. Across 1880–2024, 100% of the 2,033 US babies named Tirzah were girls.
- Boy rank, 2024
- Not ranked
- Girl rank, 2024
- #3,939
- Babies named Tirzah since 1899
- 2,033
- Most popular year
- 2017
- 71 babies
Boys and girls named Tirzah, by decade
| Decade | Boys | Girls | Share girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 6 | 100% |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1910s | 0 | 9 | 100% |
| 1920s | 0 | 10 | 100% |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | – |
| 1960s | 0 | 64 | 100% |
| 1970s | 0 | 181 | 100% |
| 1980s | 0 | 210 | 100% |
| 1990s | 0 | 285 | 100% |
| 2000s | 0 | 412 | 100% |
| 2010s | 0 | 639 | 100% |
| 2020s | 0 | 217 | 100% |
Every year
| Year | Boys | Boy rank | Girls | Girl rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0 | – | 38 | #3,939 |
| 2023 | 0 | – | 38 | #3,974 |
| 2022 | 0 | – | 44 | #3,586 |
| 2021 | 0 | – | 46 | #3,432 |
| 2020 | 0 | – | 51 | #3,135 |
| 2019 | 0 | – | 66 | #2,650 |
| 2018 | 0 | – | 55 | #3,000 |
| 2017 | 0 | – | 71 | #2,529 |
| 2016 | 0 | – | 56 | #3,006 |
| 2015 | 0 | – | 65 | #2,733 |
| 2014 | 0 | – | 64 | #2,737 |
| 2013 | 0 | – | 67 | #2,656 |
| 2012 | 0 | – | 63 | #2,801 |
| 2011 | 0 | – | 65 | #2,723 |
| 2010 | 0 | – | 67 | #2,689 |
| 2009 | 0 | – | 54 | #3,157 |
| 2008 | 0 | – | 41 | #3,930 |
| 2007 | 0 | – | 39 | #4,044 |
| 2006 | 0 | – | 50 | #3,309 |
| 2005 | 0 | – | 33 | #4,258 |
| 2004 | 0 | – | 42 | #3,564 |
| 2003 | 0 | – | 47 | #3,181 |
| 2002 | 0 | – | 36 | #3,723 |
| 2001 | 0 | – | 30 | #4,201 |
| 2000 | 0 | – | 40 | #3,400 |
| 1999 | 0 | – | 35 | #3,561 |
| 1998 | 0 | – | 29 | #4,017 |
| 1997 | 0 | – | 33 | #3,538 |
| 1996 | 0 | – | 29 | #3,825 |
| 1995 | 0 | – | 38 | #3,082 |
| 1994 | 0 | – | 30 | #3,701 |
| 1993 | 0 | – | 22 | #4,664 |
| 1992 | 0 | – | 30 | #3,673 |
| 1991 | 0 | – | 20 | #4,992 |
| 1990 | 0 | – | 19 | #5,049 |
| 1989 | 0 | – | 20 | #4,662 |
| 1988 | 0 | – | 25 | #3,796 |
| 1987 | 0 | – | 21 | #4,117 |
| 1986 | 0 | – | 18 | #4,531 |
| 1985 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,723 |
| 1984 | 0 | – | 16 | #4,728 |
| 1983 | 0 | – | 22 | #3,678 |
| 1982 | 0 | – | 21 | #3,893 |
| 1981 | 0 | – | 27 | #3,239 |
| 1980 | 0 | – | 17 | #4,497 |
| 1979 | 0 | – | 22 | #3,656 |
| 1978 | 0 | – | 25 | #3,186 |
| 1977 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,362 |
| 1976 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,181 |
| 1975 | 0 | – | 11 | #5,489 |
| 1974 | 0 | – | 23 | #3,100 |
| 1973 | 0 | – | 14 | #4,345 |
| 1972 | 0 | – | 20 | #3,267 |
| 1971 | 0 | – | 12 | #4,794 |
| 1970 | 0 | – | 8 | #6,325 |
| 1969 | 0 | – | 5 | #8,605 |
| 1968 | 0 | – | 6 | #6,950 |
| 1967 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,602 |
| 1966 | 0 | – | 6 | #6,510 |
| 1965 | 0 | – | 6 | #6,477 |
| 1964 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1963 | 0 | – | 9 | #4,870 |
| 1962 | 0 | – | 12 | #3,995 |
| 1961 | 0 | – | 10 | #4,522 |
| 1960 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1959 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1958 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1957 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1956 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1955 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1954 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1953 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1952 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1951 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1950 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1949 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1948 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1947 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1946 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1945 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1944 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1943 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1942 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1941 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1940 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1939 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1938 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1937 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1936 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1935 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1934 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1933 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1932 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1931 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1930 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1929 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1928 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1927 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1926 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1925 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1924 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1923 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1922 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,714 |
| 1921 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1920 | 0 | – | 5 | #5,684 |
| 1919 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1918 | 0 | – | 9 | #3,490 |
| 1917 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1916 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1915 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1914 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1913 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1912 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1911 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1910 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1909 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1908 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1907 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1906 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1905 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1904 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1903 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1902 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1901 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1900 | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1899 | 0 | – | 6 | #1,577 |
Highest rank
Tirzah has never been ranked as a boy name. As a girl name, it reached #1,577 in 1899. Ranks count every name SSA published for that year and sex, so they go well past the top 1,000.
Names from the same era
These names were also most popular in the 2010s, with a similar number of babies. They can work as sibling or middle names that feel like they belong together.
Source: US Social Security Administration baby name data, 1880–2024. Counts are Social Security card applications for US births; SSA leaves out names given to fewer than 5 babies in a year. Updated 2026-10-05. How these numbers are made.